Subgroups of Special Orthogonal Group

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kalinka35
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Orthogonal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the assertion that the Special Orthogonal Group in three dimensions, SO3, does not contain any subgroups isomorphic to the direct product SO2 x SO2. It is established that any finite subgroup of SO3 must be isomorphic to a cyclic group, a dihedral group, or the rotational symmetry groups of the tetrahedron, cube, or icosahedron. The participant expresses uncertainty about proving the non-isomorphism of SO2 x SO2 to a cyclic group, emphasizing the complexity of the criteria involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory, specifically the properties of the Special Orthogonal Group (SO3).
  • Familiarity with finite groups and their classifications, including cyclic and dihedral groups.
  • Knowledge of rotational symmetries of polyhedra, such as tetrahedra, cubes, and icosahedra.
  • Basic concepts of isomorphism in the context of algebraic structures.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of finite subgroups of SO3 and their classifications.
  • Research the structure and properties of the direct product SO2 x SO2.
  • Explore the concept of isomorphism in group theory, focusing on proving non-isomorphism.
  • Investigate examples of cyclic groups and dihedral groups to solidify understanding of their structures.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and researchers in mathematics, particularly those focusing on group theory, algebra, and geometric transformations. It is especially relevant for individuals studying the properties of the Special Orthogonal Groups.

Kalinka35
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I would like to show that SO3 does not contain any subgroups that are isomorphic to SO2 X SO2.


Homework Equations


I know that any finite subgroup of SO3 must be isomorphic to a cyclic group, a dihedral group, or the group of rotational symmetries of the tetrahedron, cube, or icosahedron.


The Attempt at a Solution


I think SO2 x SO2 can't be isomorphic to a cyclic group since there is no way it can have only one generator, but I'm not entirely sure how to prove this. As for the others, the criteria are more complex and the whole direct product is sort of throwing me.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kalinka35 said:
I know that any finite subgroup of SO3 must be isomorphic to a cyclic group, a dihedral group, or the group of rotational symmetries of the tetrahedron, cube, or icosahedron.

Can you find a finite subgroup of SO2 x SO2 that is not isomorphic to any of those?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K