How Do You Find a Basis for the Subspace Orthogonal to a Given Vector in ℝ3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarcL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Subspace
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a basis for the subspace S of ℝ3 that consists of vectors orthogonal to the vector (1,2,3). It is established that S is a plane, as it is defined by a single linear equation, which means it spans R² rather than R³. Participants suggest using the dot product to demonstrate orthogonality and propose selecting two independent vectors that satisfy the orthogonality condition. Additionally, the idea of using the cross product to find a second vector perpendicular to (1,2,3) is mentioned, along with the possibility of normalizing these vectors for an orthonormal basis. Ultimately, the consensus is that the subspace S is indeed a plane.
MarcL
Messages
170
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Let S, a subspace of ℝ3 be the set of vectors orthogonal to vector (1,2,3)
a)describe Set S
b) find a basis for Set S

2. Relevant Equations

That a basis has to be linearly independent and span R^3

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I would do this:
I know that vector (1,2,3) is the cross product of 2 vectors v1xv2
so I could put it in a matrix (where v1=a,b,c and v2=d,e,f)

a b c
d e f

But I am lost as to describe set S... Wouldn't I need to row reduce to see which variable is free, and then I could say whether or not it is a line or a plane ( well the dimension)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MarcL said:

Homework Statement


Let S, a subspace of ℝ3 be the set of vectors orthogonal to vector (1,2,3)
a)describe Set S
b) find a basis for Set S

2. Relevant Equations

That a basis has to be linearly independent and span R^3

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I would do this:
I know that vector (1,2,3) is the cross product of 2 vectors v1xv2
so I could put it in a matrix (where v1=a,b,c and v2=d,e,f)

a b c
d e f
What's another way to show that an arbitrary vector <x, y, z> is orthogonal to a given vector <1, 2, 3>?
MarcL said:
But I am lost as to describe set S... Wouldn't I need to row reduce to see which variable is free, and then I could say whether or not it is a line or a plane ( well the dimension)
If you take constant multiples of the given vector <1, 2, 3>, what sort of geometric object do you get? What's the dimension of this subspace?
 
What you attempt is to find a,b,c,d,e,f such that (a,b,c) x (d,e,f) = (1,2,3)
Might seem reasonable, but it's a bit tedious: you want to find six variables from three equations. And you don't really need the lengths (that comes in part b).

Orthogonal to a vector ##\vec v## is anything that has ##\vec a \cdot \vec v = 0 ## with ##|\vec a| > 0\;##. That's only one equation with three unknowns.
Pick a vector v1 that satisfies that equation.
Pick a different one and call that v2.
I think then you have a basis already according to this link (exercise doesn't ask for orthogonal or orthonormal basis !)

But if you do want them orthonormal you can do v1 x (1,2,3) to get a v2 that is perpendicular to both.
Then normalize v1 and v2.

Re describing S: Why do you think there is the possibility that S is a line ?
 
Ah I see what you're getting at, once I've found two indepedent solutions i can just put it in a matrix and solve it. I see what you mean by not spanning R^3 too. it will span R^2 if I understand correctly.

Mark44 said:
What's another way to show that an arbitrary vector <x, y, z> is orthogonal to a given vector <1, 2, 3>?

I could also find the dot product, apart from that I am not too sure what I could use to prove the orthogonality. Geometrically speaking it is a plane, so the vector would be the normal.

As for the post above me, I meant in any case ( wasn't solved and I wasn't entirely sure). However, I expected it to be a plane.
 
The dot product is the primary tool to show orthogonality.

Yes, set S is a plane.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K