Substitution Rule in Indefinite Integrals

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the substitution rule in indefinite integrals, emphasizing its role as the reverse of the chain rule in differentiation. Participants share examples, demonstrating how to apply the substitution technique effectively, such as letting u = x^3 - 2 and u = sec^2(t). The importance of adjusting the integral with the correct differential, du, is highlighted, ensuring that the substitution maintains the integral's value. Additionally, alternative substitutions are explored, including one involving the exponential function, e^x. Overall, the conversation provides insights into the mechanics of the substitution rule and its practical applications in solving integrals.
phillyolly
Messages
157
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Please explain how to use the substitution rule in indefinite integrals. I am unable even to start the problem.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • answer.jpg
    answer.jpg
    1.7 KB · Views: 547
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, one second. I am solving it right now. Will post a solution.
 
Substitution is the reverse of the chain rule in differentiation. For example,
\frac{d}{dx}(x^3 - 2)^4~=~4(x^3 - 2)^3~3x^2

The corresponding indefinite integral is
\int 12x^2(x^3 - 2)^3~dx
Here, we let u = x3 - 2, so du = 3x2~dx, so
\int 12x^2(x^3 - 2)^3~dx~=~\int 4*3x^2~(x^3 - 2)^3~dx~=~\int 4 u^3 du~=~\frac{4u^4}{4} + C~=~(x^3 - 2)^4 + C

Can you see how this technique (it's not a rule) could be applied to your problem?
 
Thank you for the helpful note. I did not know that substitution is reverse of chain rule. Here is my solution. Correct?
 

Attachments

  • answer.jpg
    answer.jpg
    9.4 KB · Views: 537
Correct as far as it goes. You still need to undo your substitution.

Also, u = x2 + 1 ==> du = 2xdx. You have x and dx, so you can get the 2 that's needed by multiplying by 2 and then multiplying on the outside of the integral by 1/2. That way, you're really multiplying by 1, which doesn't change the value of the integrand.
 
Why do you put du=2xdx? I think we need dx=du/2x.

Here is the completed version.
 

Attachments

  • answer.jpg
    answer.jpg
    10.4 KB · Views: 516
Can you check another problem please too? Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • answer.jpg
    answer.jpg
    8.3 KB · Views: 537
Sure, that works.

Another substitution that isn't so obvious is to let u = sec2t (using t for theta). Then du = 2sec(2t)tan(2t)dt

\int sec(2t)tan(2t)dt = \frac{1}{2}\int 2sec(2t)tan(2t)dt = \frac{1}{2}\int du= \frac{u}{2} + C = \frac{sec(2t)}{2} + C
 
Thank you very much!

I am also stuck on this one. ex has been always tricky for me.
 

Attachments

  • answer.jpg
    answer.jpg
    5.7 KB · Views: 512
  • #10
Mark44 said:
Sure, that works.

Another substitution that isn't so obvious is to let u = sec2t (using t for theta). Then du = 2sec(2t)tan(2t)dt

\int sec(2t)tan(2t)dt = \frac{1}{2}\int 2sec(2t)tan(2t)dt = \frac{1}{2}\int du= \frac{u}{2} + C = \frac{sec(2t)}{2} + C


OH! This one is much prettier than mine!
 
  • #11
phillyolly said:
Thank you very much!

I am also stuck on this one. ex has been always tricky for me.
This will work, but will require another substitution.

Here's a different approach: u = ex + 1, du = exdx
\int \frac{e^x~dx}{e^x + 1}=\int \frac{du}{u}= ln(u) + C = ln(e^x+ 1) + C

Since u = ex + 1 > 0 for all real x, I didn't need to include absolute values on the argument to the natural log function.
 
  • #12
Thank you a lot, Mark44!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K