Sudden problems with western-blots

  • Thread starter Thread starter ScienceEnthusiast
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on troubleshooting issues with western blots, particularly the emergence of black dots and blurs after switching to a new batch of secondary antibodies. The user has already experimented with different blockers and washing regimens without success. They noted a significant decrease in exposure time during imaging, suggesting increased background noise. Suggestions from other participants include filtering or centrifuging antibody solutions to remove potential clumps and considering pre-washing with BSA or serum to prevent interactions with secondary antibodies. The user plans to test different dilutions of the new secondary antibodies and omit the incubation with them to further investigate the source of the problem. The blocking solution used is 3% milk with 1% BSA, which is believed to be compatible with the secondary antibodies.
ScienceEnthusiast
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
After changing secondary antibodies, western blots comes out badly
Hello, a problem from a newbie with western blots.


I've been doing western blots for a few months now, and everything was going alright. But 2 weeks ago, all blots started coming out badly as in the photos. Before, neither we had those black dots ont the sides of membranes, or those black blurs. They did started to show when we started using new batch of secondary antibodies tho. We've checked some things already, like different blocker, different washing regieme, blocking in PBST or in blocker, but none of them changed much. Also the exposition time during imagining changed from around 20-30 seconds to less than a second. Next week we will try different dillution of secondary antibodies, since with the old batch, we were using quite low dillutions (1:1000, they also were quite old), but before that i wanted to ask, if anyone maybe had similiar problems.


Thank you for your time and interest.

2024-11-12 B_20  metoda dwudniowa_bloker=mleko3% + BSA1% też do inkubacji.jpg


2024-11-13 B_20  metoda dwudniowa_bloker=mleko3% + BSA1% też do inkubacji_lodówka.jpg


2024-11-21 B_20 metoda dwudniowa_bloker=mleko% + BSA1%_też do inkubacji_membrana z innej parti...jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
Do you filter or spin down your antibody solutions?
The new antibody maybe clumping of something. Ultra-filtration or centrifuging might remove clumps and leave the good stuff. I used to use filtration, but you lose some of the volume in the filter.

What does it look like if you leave out the new antibody, still a lot of background or clear?
There lots of controls you may have done already.

Do you pre-wash with BSA or serum from a species your secondary antibodies won't interact with?
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Astronuc and berkeman
We havent' been spinning them, nor filtering, I think we will look into it. We haven't tried omitting the incubation with secondaries yet, will propably try it on monday. We block our membranes with 3% milk + 1% BSA solution, which shouldn't interact with our secondaries, if I understand properly what you're asking about.

And thanks for your interest and ideas.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
54
Views
7K
Replies
37
Views
14K
Back
Top