MHB Sufficient Proof: $4 \nmid n^2 - 2$ for $r=0$

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmt1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that for integers n, the expression $4 \nmid n^2 - 2$ holds true when r = 0 in the context of the quotient remainder theorem. It is established that if n is a multiple of 4, then $n^2$ results in 0 mod 4, leading to $n^2 - 2$ being congruent to 2 mod 4, which is not divisible by 4. The argument is further supported by the observation that all perfect squares are either 0 or 1 mod 4, confirming that $n^2 - 2$ can only yield results of 2 or 3 mod 4. Thus, the conclusion is reached that for the case of r = 0, it is indeed sufficient to state that $4 \nmid n^2 - 2$.
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
I would like to prove that this is incorrect:

$\exists x \in \Bbb{Z}$ such that $ 4 | n^2 - 2$

I can use the quotient remainder theorem,

$n = dq + r$ where $ 0 <= r < d $ and $ d = 4$

For the case $ r = 0$ is this sufficient proof?

$n = 4q $ and $4 | n^2 - 2$ thus $4 | 16q^2 - 2$

then $4 | 4(4q^2) + 2$

which can't be true, $\therefore $ for the case $ r = 0$, $4 \nmid n^2 - 2$

Is this sufficient for the case $r = 0$? (I can figure out the rest of the cases from here)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There's no need to use the "quotient remainder theorem" (unless you've been directed to do so).

It's easily proved that all perfect squares are either 0 or 1 mod 4, thus n2 - 2 is 2 or 3 mod 4.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top