Suggestions on how to go about proving a^(m+n)=a^(m)a^(n)

  • Thread starter Thread starter alianna
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Suggestions
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the equality a^(m+n) = a^(m)a^(n) for a nonzero number a and integers m and n. Participants are exploring various approaches to establish this equality, particularly through the method of induction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the potential need to handle positive and negative values of n separately. There is mention of using induction, with one participant expressing uncertainty about applying it to both m and n as integers. Another participant outlines steps for induction but questions the logic behind focusing on m while leaving n unaddressed.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their thoughts on induction and questioning the assumptions involved in the proof. Some guidance has been offered regarding the induction process, but there remains confusion about how to handle negative values and the reasoning behind the induction steps.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of proving the equality for both positive and negative integers, as well as the structure of the induction proof itself.

alianna
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Let a be a nonzero number and m and n be integers. Prove the following equality. a^(m+n)=a^(m)a^(n)


Im not really sure what direction to go in. I am not sure if I need to show for n positive and negative separately or is there an easier way.


My attempt/ideas:
When n>0: a^(m)a^(n)= (a*a*...*a)(m times) *(a*a*a*a*...*a)(n times)
=a*a*...*a(m+n times)
=a^(m+n)
When n<0: a^(m)a^(n)=a^(m)=a...a(m times)/ a...a(n times)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with induction?
 
Yes we just went over it but i wasn't sure how to go about induction with m and n being integers...
 
1) Take ##m=0##. Prove that ##a^{m + n} = a^m a^n##. This shouldn't be a problem.

2) Assume the result holds for ##m##. Prove it holds for ##m+1##. So you know that ##a^{m+n} = a^m a^n##. You need to prove ##a^{m + n + 1} = a^{m+1} a^n##.
 
So would you be able to say: Since a^(m+n)=a^(m)a^(n).
Then this implies that: a^(m+n+1)= a^(m+1+n)= a^(m+1)a^(n)?

This doesn't seem right because we are assuming what we are trying to prove.
Why are you allowed to show for m+1 but don't have to for n+1 or do you just assume since m+1 works then n+1 works?
Im still confused how this deals with the negative values of m and n.
 
alianna said:
So would you be able to say: Since a^(m+n)=a^(m)a^(n).
Then this implies that: a^(m+n+1)= a^(m+1+n)= a^(m+1)a^(n)?

This doesn't seem right because we are assuming what we are trying to prove.
Why are you allowed to show for m+1 but don't have to for n+1 or do you just assume since m+1 works then n+1 works?
Im still confused how this deals with the negative values of m and n.

Hint :

##a^{m+n+1} = aaaa...a##

(m+n) + 1 times.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K