Sum of a vector parallel and orthogonal to.

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 8K views
Differentiate1
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


v = 3i - j u = 2i + j - 3k
Express vector u as a sum of a vector parallel to v and a vector orthogonal to v.

Homework Equations


Proj of u onto v = [ (u • v) / |v|^2 ]v
Expressing vector u as sum of a vector parappel to v and a vector vector orthogonal to v
>> u = [Proj of u onto v] + u

The Attempt at a Solution


I found the projection of vector u onto v which is [1/2](3i - j) then added it to vector u = 2i + j - 3k to get
u = [7/2] i + [1/2] j - 3 k <<==>> Vector u expressed as the sum of a vector parallel to v and orthogonal to v.

I would like to receive assistance to assure that what I've done works.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Differentiate1 said:

Homework Statement


v = 3i - j u = 2i + j - 3k
Express vector u as a sum of a vector parallel to v and a vector orthogonal to v.

Homework Equations


Proj of u onto v = [ (u • v) / |v|^2 ]v
Expressing vector u as sum of a vector parappel to v and a vector vector orthogonal to v
>> u = [Proj of u onto v] + u

The Attempt at a Solution


I found the projection of vector u onto v which is [1/2](3i - j) then added it to vector u = 2i + j - 3k to get
u = [7/2] i + [1/2] j - 3 k <<==>> Vector u expressed as the sum of a vector parallel to v and orthogonal to v.

I would like to receive assistance to assure that what I've done works.
I will use the notation Pu for the projection of u onto the 1-dimensional subspace spanned by v. You're saying that u=Pu+u. But that would mean that Pu=0 (since you can cancel u from both sides).

If u=Pu+w, then what is w? (I think you will find that the answer is automatically orthogonal to v).
 
Thanks for the reply. I believe I've found it and the check I used enhances the answer I got. Instead of just Pu + w, I did, w - Pu to get an orthogonal vector to v. The dot product of (w - Pu) with vector v came out with a scalar of 0, which proves it's orthogonal.