Sum of the dot product of complex vectors

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the summation of components of complex vectors, specifically focusing on the equation for the total electric field vector, ##\widetilde{\vec{E_t}}##. The user references a textbook equation, ##\widetilde{\vec{E_t}} = (\widetilde{\vec{E_i}} \cdot \hat{e_p}) \hat{e_p}##, and attempts to derive the expression ##\widetilde{\vec{E_0t}} = E_0 cos \theta \hat{x} + E_0 sin^* \theta (0)##. Clarifications are sought regarding the notation used, particularly the definition of ##e_{p}*## and its representation as a scalar rather than a vector.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex vector notation
  • Familiarity with electric field vector representations
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities in complex analysis
  • Proficiency in vector calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of electric field vectors in complex notation
  • Study the properties of complex numbers and their geometric interpretations
  • Learn about vector projections and their applications in physics
  • Examine the use of notation in advanced physics textbooks for clarity
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and applied mathematics who are working with complex vectors and electric field calculations.

happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
Summary:: summation of the components of a complex vector

Hi,

In my textbook I have
##\widetilde{\vec{E_t}} = (\widetilde{\vec{E_i}} \cdot \hat{e_p}) \hat{e_p}##

##\widetilde{\vec{E_t}} = \sum_j( (\widetilde{\vec{E_{ij}}} \cdot {e_{p_j}}*) \hat{e_p}##

For ##\hat{e_p} = \hat{x}##
##\widetilde{\vec{E_{0i}}} = (E_{0x} \hat{x} \pm E_{0y} \hat{y} )e^{i\theta}##

Thus, ##\widetilde{\vec{E_0t}} = (\sum E_{0ij} e_{pj}*) \hat{e_p}##

and then
##\widetilde{\vec{E_0t}} = E_0 cos \theta \hat{x} + E_0 sin^* \theta (0) ##

I don't see how to get the last line. This is what I think.

##\widetilde{\vec{E_0t}} = [(E_{0x}e^{i \theta}] \hat{x}## where, ##e_{p}* = x - iy = 1## because ##\hat{e_p} = \hat{x}##

= ## E_{0x} (cos \theta + i sin \theta) \hat{x}##

I tried different way to get the same result, but I'm not sure to fully understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EpselonZero said:
Summary:: summation of the components of a complex vector

Hi,

In my textbook I have
##\widetilde{\vec{E_t}} = (\widetilde{\vec{E_i}} \cdot \hat{e_p}) \hat{e_p}##

##\widetilde{\vec{E_t}} = \sum_j( (\widetilde{\vec{E_{ij}}} \cdot {e_{p_j}}*) \hat{e_p}##

For ##\hat{e_p} = \hat{x}##
##\widetilde{\vec{E_{0i}}} = (E_{0x} \hat{x} \pm E_{0y} \hat{y} )e^{i\theta}##

Thus, ##\widetilde{\vec{E_0t}} = (\sum E_{0ij} e_{pj}*) \hat{e_p}##

and then
##\widetilde{\vec{E_0t}} = E_0 cos \theta \hat{x} + E_0 sin^* \theta (0) ##

I don't see how to get the last line. This is what I think.

##\widetilde{\vec{E_0t}} = [(E_{0x}e^{i \theta}] \hat{x}## where, ##e_{p}* = x - iy = 1## because ##\hat{e_p} = \hat{x}##

= ## E_{0x} (cos \theta + i sin \theta) \hat{x}##

I tried different way to get the same result, but I'm not sure to fully understand.
Shouldn't ep* be a vector?
You write ep* = x -iy. That's a scalar.
 
Too many undefined notational symbols to guess at, which textbook are you using?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K