sihag
- 28
- 0
i was looking for a counter example.
and, I've not been able to think of any.
and, I've not been able to think of any.
The discussion centers on the properties of prime ideals in the context of algebraic geometry, specifically examining whether the sum of two prime ideals can itself be prime. The participants analyze the principal ideals <2> and <3> in the ring of integers Z, concluding that their sum is Z, which is not a prime ideal. They also explore the geometric interpretation of ideals as algebraic sets, noting that the intersection of irreducible algebraic sets can be reducible, providing counterexamples such as 2Z and 3Z. The conversation highlights the relationship between ideals and their corresponding geometric representations.
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, algebraic geometers, and students studying ring theory and algebraic geometry who seek to deepen their understanding of prime ideals and their geometric implications.
sihag said:i did not understand the geometric bit.
well i considered the principal ideals <2> and <3>
their union includes 1 which is a unit in Z, so the ideal of the sum is nothing but Z itself right ?
and that can't be prime by definition ? (since an ideal P is prime => P /= R (the ring in consideration))
more hints please.
Think of rings like R[x, y]. Algebraic curves (like the parabola y - x^2 = 0) correspond to ideals (like the ideal <y - x^2>). Sums of ideals relate to intersections of curves. Can you work out why? Do you see how a non-prime ideal corresponds, in some sense, into a curve that is the union of two or more other curves?sihag said:i did not understand the geometric bit.