Summation involving Clebsch–Gordan coefficients

  • Thread starter Thread starter patric44
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum mechahnics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a derivation involving Clebsch–Gordan coefficients in the context of second quantization formalism. The user is struggling with a specific summation and is attempting to apply a known relation to simplify the expression. They reference Messiah's book for guidance but express uncertainty about recalling the exact method. The conversation highlights the complexities of manipulating these coefficients and the need for clarity in the derivation steps. Assistance is sought to navigate the mathematical intricacies involved in the summation.
patric44
Messages
308
Reaction score
40
Homework Statement
summation involving Clebsch–Gordan coefficients
Relevant Equations
stated below
Hi all
I am trying to follow a derivation of something involving second quantization formalism, I am stuck at this step :
$$
\sum_{m2}\sum_{\mu1}
\bra{2,m1,2,m2}\ket{k,q}\bra{2,\mu1,2,\mu2}\ket{k,-q}\delta_{-m2,\mu1}
= (-1)^{2+m2}\frac{\sqrt{2k+1}}{\sqrt{5}}\bra{k,-q,2,m2}\ket{2,-m1}\times (-1)^{2+m2}\frac{\sqrt{2k+1}}{\sqrt{5}}\bra{k,-q,2,m2}\ket{2,\mu2}
$$
i tried to use the relation:
$$
\bra{j1,m1,j2,m2}\ket{J,M} = (-1)^{2+m2}\frac{\sqrt{2J+1}}{\sqrt{2j1+1}}\;\bra{J,-M,j2m2}\ket{j1,-m1}
$$
that will reproduce the first term but not the second,
any hint on how to start

$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I cannot say that I remember exactly how to do this, but I remember my QM2 class then try to consult Messiah's book. (Messiah to the rescue... :oldbiggrin:).
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top