Summation involving von Mangoldt function

  • Thread starter mathslover
  • Start date
  • #1
17
0
Please help me in solving the problem,
find the sum
Sum{r=2 to infinity} (von Mangoldt(r)-1)/r



Your help is appreciated.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
188
1
do you mean [tex] \sum _{n=2}^{\infty} \frac{ \Lambda (n) -1}{n} [/tex] ??


i think is divergent
 
  • #3
17
0
hi mhill,
can you prove that the series is divergent?



-Ng
 
  • #4
CRGreathouse
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,820
0
hi mhill,
can you prove that the series is divergent?
[tex]\frac1n \sum_{k=1}^n\Lambda(k)=1+o(1/\log n)[/tex]

so your series seems to be something like

[tex]\sum\frac{1}{n\log n}\approx\log\log n[/tex]

Obviously this is very heuristic here.
 
  • #5
CRGreathouse
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,820
0
OK, it diverges.

[tex]\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \frac{\Lambda(n) -1}{n}=\sum_p\sum_{k=1}^\infty\(\frac{\log p-1}{p}+\frac{\log p-1}{p^2}+\cdots\)=\sum_p\frac{\log p-1}{p-1}[/tex]
and we all know that
[tex]\sum_p\frac1p=+\infty[/tex]
 
  • #6
17
0
when n is a prime or prime power, the summation is okay.

but suppose when n=6, then the sum is (von Mangoldt(6) -1)/6 , which is = -1/6,

as n runs from 2 to infinity,can we settle the problem of convergency or divergency?



-Ng
 
  • #7
CRGreathouse
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,820
0
when n is a prime or prime power, the summation is okay.

but suppose when n=6, then the sum is (von Mangoldt(6) -1)/6 , which is = -1/6,

as n runs from 2 to infinity,can we settle the problem of convergency or divergency?
My post addressed the case where n runs from 2 to infinity, which diverges.
 
  • #8
17
0
Hi CRGreatHouse,

In your post 1673, the summation on LHS runs from n=2 to infinity, (n=2,3,4,5,6,7,8,...)

But the summation on RHS runs over all primes.(p=2,3,5,7,...)


From the definition of von Mangoldt function,when n=6,10,12,14,15,18,... , the summand

became (-1/n) whenever n is not equal to any prime or prime power.

Is something missing ?


-Ng
 
  • #9
CRGreathouse
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,820
0
Is something missing ?
Right, right... yeah, I calculated it for numerator [itex]\Lambda[/itex] first, forgetting about the -1 term, and when I added it back in forgot that part.

But wouldn't that also suggest divergence (in the other direction), since the prime powers are density 0, the reciprocal primes vary as log log n, and the reciprocal integers vary as log n?

Numerical experimentation would be nice here.
 
  • #10
17
0
I have tried numerical calculation and the sum seems to converge to ~ -1.16

Can we approach the problem from Zeta function?



-Ng
 

Related Threads on Summation involving von Mangoldt function

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
789
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
4K
Top