B Summation Rules: What Happens When k=0?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter StevenJacobs990
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rules Summation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the summation rules, particularly when the index k equals 0. It clarifies that the sum remains valid regardless of the lower bound being negative, as demonstrated with the example of summing 3 from k=0 and k=-1. The formula for summation is confirmed as Σ from k=a to b of c equals c multiplied by (b-a+1). This emphasizes that the summation counts the number of terms rather than the sections between them. Understanding these rules is essential for accurate mathematical calculations involving summation.
StevenJacobs990
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
n
∑ 3
k=0

How does this make sense when k=0?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The sum is ##3+3+...=3(n+1)##
 
Gene Naden said:
The sum is ##3+3+...=3(n+1)##
Oh okay. The lower bound is the index origin and doesn't matter if it is negative?
n
∑ 3
k=-1
3+3+...=3(n+2)
 
Correct!
 
To summarise,
$$
\sum_{k=a}^{b} c = c (b-a+1)
$$
for constant ##c##.
 
DrClaude said:
To summarise,
$$
\sum_{k=a}^{b} c = c (b-a+1)
$$
for constant ##c##.
i.e. one is counting fence posts, not sections of wire.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top