Can Super Mercurys Support Life and Sustainable Plate Tectonics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KTevolved
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concept of super Mercurys, which are defined as planets similar in size to Earth but with large, dense iron cores. Participants debate whether these planets can support life and sustain plate tectonics, drawing comparisons to super Earths. The conversation highlights the ambiguity in classification, questioning if Earth itself qualifies as a super Mercury based on orbital distance and density criteria.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of planetary classification, specifically "super Earths" and "super Mercurys"
  • Knowledge of planetary geology and the requirements for sustainable plate tectonics
  • Familiarity with atmospheric science related to dense atmospheres
  • Basic concepts of exoplanet discovery and orbital mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the characteristics of super Earths and their potential for supporting life
  • Explore the geological processes that enable plate tectonics on terrestrial planets
  • Investigate the atmospheric conditions necessary for sustaining life on dense-core planets
  • Examine recent discoveries of exoplanets with Mercury-like densities and their orbital positions
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, planetary scientists, and anyone interested in the potential for life on exoplanets, particularly those studying the characteristics of super Earths and super Mercurys.

KTevolved
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
So we know there are super Earths, but what about super mercurys? These planets would be about Earth sized maybe bigger with large dense iron cores. So could these super mercurys support life, have thick dense atmospheres and generate sustainable plate tectonics? I've always wondered about this ever since we discovered super Earths.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I do not think knowledge about super Earth's is good enough to distinguish between "similar to Earth but larger" and "similar to mercury but larger". As far as I know, everything rocky and larger than Earth is called "super earth".
 
KTevolved said:
So we know there are super Earths, but what about super mercurys? These planets would be about Earth sized maybe bigger with large dense iron cores.

By this definition, wouldn't Earth be a super mercury?
 
If we use orbital-distance-from-star criteria, then we certainly have discovered extra-solar planets that are much closer to their suns than Mercury is to ours. So in that distance sense, they might be viewed as super-Mercuries. But if we include density in the criteria, then we will have fewer choices in what we call a super Mercury. I'm not sure if they have found one with Mercury's density that close or closer to its star yet.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K