Superluminal moving points 4-velocity

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on reconciling two definitions of 4-velocity, specifically how to express it in terms of proper time and spatial intervals. The derivation shows that 4-velocity can be represented as a function of the speed of light and spatial coordinates, leading to the conclusion that 4-velocity is proportional to the Lorentz factor. The participant successfully derives the relationship between 4-velocity and the worldline but encounters difficulties in proving that the squared magnitude of 4-velocity equals negative the square of the speed of light. Despite achieving the initial results, there is concern about the mathematical rigor of the methods used, particularly regarding the treatment of derivatives. The discussion concludes with a desire to further explore the proof that 4-velocity is tangent to the worldline.
PhDeezNutz
Messages
851
Reaction score
561
Homework Statement
We can define the 4-velocity of a superluminally moving points in analogy to that of normal particles:

$$\tilde{U} = c \frac{d\tilde{R}}{ds}$$.

Prove that

$$\tilde{U} = \left( \frac{u^2}{c^2} \right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} \left( c , \tilde{u} \right)$$

and

$$U^2 = - c^2$$

But ##\tilde{U}## is still tangent to the worldline.
Relevant Equations
$$\tilde{R} = \left( ct,x,y,z \right)$$

$$\tilde{U} = \frac{d\tilde{R}}{d \tau}$$

$$d \tau^2 = \frac{ds^2}{c^2} \Rightarrow d \tau = \frac{ds}{c}$$

I think for sub-luminal velocities we use signature ##(+,-,-,-)## and for super luminal velocities we use ##(-,+,+,+)##. I initially thought we could use either signature in either case but I'm only able to get

$$\tilde{U} = \left( \frac{u^2}{c^2} \right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} \left( c , \tilde{u} \right)$$

using ##(-,+,+,+)##

To that end

$$\eta = \begin{pmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1\end{pmatrix}$$
The first thing I want to do is reconcile the two definitions of 4-velocities ##\tilde{U} = \frac{d \tilde{R}}{d \tau} = c \frac{ d \tilde{R}}{ds}##Start off with the usual definition of 4-velocity##\tilde{U} = \frac{d \tilde{R}}{d \tau}##we know that d \tau^2 = \frac{ds^2}{c^2} \Rightarrow d \tau = \frac{ds}{c}So ##\tilde{U} = \frac{d \tilde{R}}{d \tau} = c \frac{ d \tilde{R}}{ds}##Now going back to the more tractable definition of 4-velocity ##\tilde{U} = \frac{d \tilde{R}}{d \tau} = \frac{d}{d \tau} \left( ct,x,y,z \right) = \left( c \frac{dt}{d\tau}, \dot{x} \frac{dt}{d\tau}, \dot{y} \frac{dt}{d\tau}, \dot{z} \frac{dt}{d\tau} \right)##What is ##\frac{dt}{d\tau}## ?##ds^2 = \left( c dt, dx, dy, dz \right) \eta \left( c dt, dx, dy, dz \right) = - c^2 dt^2 + \left( dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 \right)####d \tau^2 = \frac{ds^2}{c^2} = - dt^2 + \frac{1}{c^2} \left(dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 \right)####\frac{d\tau^2}{dt^2} = -1 + \frac{1}{c^2} \left( \dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2 + \dot{z}^2 \right) = \left(\frac{u^2}{c^2} - 1 \right)####\frac{d \tau}{dt} = \sqrt{\frac{u^2}{c^2} - 1} \Rightarrow \frac{dt}{d \tau} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{u^2}{c^2} - 1}}##Therefore the first result we wanted (correct)##\tilde{U} = \left( \frac{u^2}{c^2} - 1\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} \left(c, \tilde{u} \right) ##However I am having trouble proving ##U^2 = - c^2##Let ##\Gamma = \left( \frac{u^2}{c^2} - 1\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}####U^2 = \tilde{U} \cdot \tilde{U} = \left( \Gamma c, \Gamma u_1, \Gamma u_2 , \Gamma u_3\right) \eta \left( \Gamma c, \Gamma u_1, \Gamma u_2 , \Gamma u_3\right) = \left( \Gamma c, \Gamma u_1, \Gamma u_2 , \Gamma u_3\right) \cdot \left( -\Gamma c, \Gamma u_1, \Gamma u_2 , \Gamma u_3\right) = -\Gamma^2 c^2 + \Gamma u^2 = \Gamma^2 \left( u^2 - c^2 \right) = \Gamma c^2 \left( \frac{u^2}{c^2} - 1\right) = c^2##we wanted ##-c^2## ( Before moving on to prove that the 4-velocity is tangent to the worldline I'd like to reconcile this result first)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe I have reconciled the first two results that I was supposed to get, but in doing so I believe I employed maneuvers that mathematicians would find egregious. Namely treating derivatives as quotients of differentials. There has to be some justification for this, unfortunately I do not know what that is because I am far from a mathematician.

##\tilde{R} = \left(ct,x,y,z \right)##

Using the signature ##(-,+,+,+)##

##ds^2 = - c^2 dt^2 + \left(dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 \right)##

##ds = \sqrt{-c^2 dt^2 + \left(dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 \right)} = sqrt{dt^2 \left( - c^2 + \frac{dx^2}{dt^2} + \frac{dy^2}{dt^2} + \frac{dz^2}{dt^2}\right)}##

##ds = \sqrt{u^2 - c^2} dt##

##d\tilde{R} = \left(cdt, dx, dy, dz \right)##

##\tilde{U} = c \frac{d\tilde{R}}{ds} = \frac{c \left(cdt, dx, dy, dz \right)}{\sqrt{u^2 - c^2} dt}= \left(\frac{c^2}{\sqrt{u^2 - c^2}} , \frac{c\dot{x}}{\sqrt{u^2 - c^2}}, \frac{c\dot{y}}{\sqrt{u^2 - c^2}}, \frac{c\dot{z}}{\sqrt{u^2 - c^2}}\right) ##

## \tilde{U} = \left( \frac{c}{\sqrt{\frac{u^2}{c^2} - 1}}, \frac{\dot{x}}{\sqrt{\frac{u^2}{c^2} - 1}}, \frac{\dot{y}}{\sqrt{\frac{u^2}{c^2} - 1}}, \frac{\dot{z}}{\sqrt{\frac{u^2}{c^2} - 1}}\right)##

Therefore,

##\tilde{U} = \left( \frac{u^2}{c^2} - 1\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} \left( c, \tilde{u} \right)##

Now for ##U^2##

##U^2 = \tilde{U} \eta \tilde{U} = \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{u^2}{c^2} - 1}}\right)^2 \left( c, u_1, u_2, u_3\right) \cdot \left(c, - u_1, - u_2, - u_3 \right)##

##= \frac{1}{\frac{u^2}{c^2} - 1} \left( c^2 - u^2 \right) = -c^2##
 
Now that I think I got the answers to the first two parts I can move onto proving U is tangent to the world line. I don’t know how to prove this. I thought it was the definition.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
987
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K