Superposition Principle for u(x,t) in Diff. Eq.

  • Thread starter Thread starter leopard
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the function u(x,t), which satisfies the wave equation u_{xx} = u_{tt} under the boundary conditions u_x(0,t) = u_x(pi, t) = 0, adheres to the superposition principle. The user proposes a solution using the linear combination w(x,t) = au(x,t) + bv(x,t), but encounters confusion regarding the constants and the relationship between the derivatives. The clarification sought involves rewriting the equation as u_{xx} - u_{tt} = 0 to better analyze the properties of w(x,t).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave equations, specifically the form u_{xx} = u_{tt}
  • Familiarity with boundary conditions in differential equations
  • Knowledge of the superposition principle in linear systems
  • Basic calculus, particularly partial derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the wave equation and its solutions
  • Learn about boundary value problems in partial differential equations
  • Explore the implications of the superposition principle in physics and engineering
  • Investigate methods for solving linear combinations of functions in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are dealing with wave equations and their properties, particularly those interested in the superposition principle and boundary value problems.

leopard
Messages
123
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The function u(x,t) satisfies the equation

(1) [tex]u_{xx}[/tex] = [tex]u_{tt}[/tex] for 0 < x < pi, t > 0

and the boundary conditions

(2) [tex]u_x[/tex](0,t) = [tex]u_x[/tex](pi, t) = 0

Show that (1) and (2) satisfy the superposition principle.

2. The attempt at a solution

I let w(x,t) = au(x,t) + bv(x,t) for two constants a and b.

[tex]w_{tt}[/tex] = [tex]au_{tt}[/tex] + [tex]bv_{tt}[/tex] = [tex]au_{xx}[/tex] + [tex]bv_{xx}[/tex] = [tex]cw_{xx}[/tex], where c is a constant

Have I now showed that w(x,t) satisfies (1)? [tex]w_{xx}[/tex] is not equal to [tex]w_{tt}[/tex] unless c is 1...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You said you let w= au+ bv. What is c? What do you mean by "auxx+ bvxx= c wxx"? I don't see where that comes from.

Perhaps it would be simpler to see if you rewrote the equation as uxx- utt= 0. What is wxx- wtt?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K