Superposition to solve circuit with dependent source

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying the superposition principle to solve a circuit with a dependent source, specifically with a voltage source of 10V, resistors R1 at 1.7Ω, and R2 at 0.50Ω. The initial calculation yielded an incorrect current of 1.7 A, prompting a reevaluation. The correct approach involved retaining the dependent source as 2I during calculations, leading to a final current of 2.024 A after combining results from both scenarios of suppressing the sources.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the superposition principle in circuit analysis
  • Familiarity with Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Proficiency in applying Ohm's Law (V=IR)
  • Knowledge of current and voltage dividers in electrical circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the superposition principle in circuits with multiple dependent sources
  • Learn about advanced circuit analysis techniques using Laplace transforms
  • Explore the concept of node voltage analysis for complex circuits
  • Investigate the implications of dependent sources on circuit behavior and stability
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and professionals involved in circuit analysis and design, particularly those working with dependent sources and superposition methods.

zealeth
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Assume that Vs = 10V , R1 = 1.7Ω , and R2 = 0.50Ω. Find the current I in the figure using the superposition principle.

Steif.ch03.p69.jpg


Homework Equations



Superposition principle
KCL, KVL
V=IR
Current and voltage dividers

The Attempt at a Solution



I = I' + I''

First replacing the current source with an open circuit, I have:

(1.7+0.50)*I' = 10 - 2I' using KVL
Solving, I' = 2.38 A

Now replacing the voltage source with a short, I use the current divider to get:

-I'' = 3*0.5/(1.7+0.5) = 0.682 A
I'' = -0.682 A

I = 2.38 - 0.682 = 1.7 A, which is incorrect.

EDIT: Should I have left the dependent source as 2I and solved for I in the final equation, or am I doing something else wrong?

EDIT2: Yes, I did have to leave it as 2I. Got it :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A complete solution to wrap things up.

Using superposition:
1) Suppressing the current source:

We are left with a single series circuit (blue dotted components are suppressed/removed):

upload_2016-2-5_14-46-5.png


Writing Ohm's Law for the circuit we have
## I' = \frac{V_s - 2 I'}{R_1 + R_2} ##

## I' = \frac{V_s}{R1 + R2 + 2}~~ ## after solving for I'

## I' = 2.381~Amps##

2) Suppressing the voltage source leaves us with:

upload_2016-2-5_14-45-39.png


Let v be the voltage at the junction of the resistors. Then writing a node equation there:

##\frac{v}{R_1} - I_s + \frac{v - 2 I''}{R_2} = 0##

But Ohm's Law also gives us ##v = -I'' R_1##. So substituting for v in the node equation:

## -I - I_s + \frac{(-I'' R_1 - 2 I'')}{R_2} = 0##

##I'' = -I_s \frac{R_2}{R_1 + R_2 + 2} ##

##I'' = -0.357~Amps##

3) Combining the results:
##I = I' + I'' = 2.024~Amps##

Quick Check:
##V_s - I R_1 = (I + I_s) R_2 + 2 I##

##I = \frac{V_s - I_s R_2}{R1 + R_2 + 2} = 2.024~ Amps##
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-2-5_14-22-2.png
    upload_2016-2-5_14-22-2.png
    2.4 KB · Views: 587
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K