I'm pretty shaky with my understanding of much beyond simple tree-level calculations. When people talk about triangle diagrams, they sometimes say one will get a 'supression factor' of xxx. For example, in the consider the triangle diagram for H[itex]\rightarrow\gamma\gamma[/itex] with Ws running around the loop (attached). I want to know, without doing the full calculation, whether that would be more or less suppressed than second-order H[itex]\rightarrow b \bar{b}[/itex] (the same triangle diagram, except with bottom quark external legs instead of photons and a quark where the vertical W is.)(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

My thought was that you can use the cutting rules, so the relevant difference between the two is that H[itex]\rightarrow\gamma\gamma[/itex] has two WW[itex]\gamma[/itex] vertices and a W propagator, and H[itex]\rightarrow b \bar{b}[/itex] has two Wbb vertices and a fermion propagator. But plugging everything in, I get that H[itex]\rightarrow\gamma\gamma[/itex] should be more suppressed than second-order H[itex]\rightarrow b \bar{b}[/itex], which isn't correct. Does my approach make any sense?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Supression factor for triangle diagrams

Loading...

Similar Threads - Supression factor triangle | Date |
---|---|

A Reference on Sudakov form factors | Oct 17, 2017 |

A Phase space factor | Jul 15, 2017 |

Weak decay, decay rate, colour-supressed and colour-allowed | Mar 25, 2015 |

Cabibbo Supression | Mar 18, 2007 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**