Surface Area of Paraboloid Limited by Plane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on computing the surface area of a paraboloid defined by the inequalities V: {-2(x+y) ≤ z ≤ 4 - x² - y²}. The user has attempted to parametrize the paraboloid using polar coordinates and Cartesian coordinates but struggles with setting the correct limits of integration. The parametrization is given as x = r sin(θ), y = r cos(θ), z = 4 - r², leading to a surface area integral expressed as ∫∫ ||T_r × T_θ|| dr dθ. The region of integration D is defined by the intersection of the paraboloid and the plane, resulting in a complex integral that the user finds challenging to solve.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of surface area integrals in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with parametrization techniques in polar and Cartesian coordinates
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, specifically cross products and their applications
  • Experience with integration techniques, including double integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for simplifying double integrals in polar coordinates
  • Learn about surface area calculations for surfaces of revolution
  • Explore the use of cylindrical coordinates for complex integration problems
  • Study the application of Jacobians in changing variables for multiple integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineering students, and anyone involved in advanced calculus or geometric analysis who seeks to understand surface area calculations for complex shapes like paraboloids.

Telemachus
Messages
820
Reaction score
30
Hi there, I have to compute the surface area for
V:\{ -2(x+y)\leq{}z\leq{}4-x^2-y^2 \}

I have a problem on finding the surface area for the paraboloid limited by the plane. I've parametrized the plane in polar coordinates, I thought it would be easier this way, but also tried in cartesian coordinates with the same result. The problem I have is to set the limits of integration on such a way that determines the area of the paraboloid limited by the plane.

So the paraboloid is parametrized by:

x=r\sin \theta,y=r \cos \theta,z=4-r^2

Then T_r=( \sin \theta, \cos \theta,-2r);T_{\theta}=(r\cos\theta,-r\sin\theta,0)
T_r \times T_{\theta}=(-2r^2\sin^2 \theta,-2r^2\cos^2\theta,-r)
||T_r \times T_{\theta}||=\sqrt[ ]{4r^4+r^2}

Now the surface area is determined by: \displaystyle\int_{D} ||T_r \times T_{\theta}||drd\theta
Now D is the region inside the disc determined by the intersection of the surfaces. So D:
-2x-2y=4-x^2-y^2\rightarrow (x-1)^2+(y-1)^2=6

And this is my region of integration for my paraboloid. Now it doesn't seem so easy to express the region for the parametrization I choose.

So I'm trying to solve this in cartesian coordinates, this is the integral for the surface in cartesian coord:

\displaystyle\int_{1-\sqrt[ ]{6}}^{1+\sqrt[ ]{6}}\int_{-\sqrt[ ]{6-(x-1)^2}+1}^{\sqrt[ ]{6-(x-1)^2}+1} \sqrt[ ]{4x^2+4y^2+1} dydx

But this integral isn't so easy to solve. I tried to go from here to cylindrical coordinates, using the substitution x=1+r\cos\theta,y=1+r\sin\theta that helps a bit with the limits of integration.

Then I get: \displaystyle\int_{1-\sqrt[ ]{6}}^{1+\sqrt[ ]{6}}\int_{-\sqrt[ ]{6-(x-1)^2}+1}^{\sqrt[ ]{6-(x-1)^2}+1} \sqrt[ ]{4x^2+4y^2+1} dydx=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\sqrt[ ]{6}}\int_{0}^{2\pi}r\sqrt[ ]{16+8r\cos\theta+8r\sin\theta+4r^2}d\theta dr

Thats the best expression I get, but still too complicated to integrate by hand.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Telemachus! :smile:

You're trying to use a ∫∫

It would be simpler to use a single ∫, over z …

just ask yourself how large the arc-angle is at each height z. :wink:
 
Sorry, didn't get it, could you write the expression? you mean using something like a surface of revolution?

Thanks Tim.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K