Surface area of solid of revolution with undefined derivative

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the surface area of the solid formed by revolving the curve defined by the function y=3x^{2/3}-1 around the x-axis, specifically between the limits x=0 and x=8. The derivative y'=2x^{-1/3} is undefined at x=0, leading to the question of whether the surface area can still be computed using improper integrals. The consensus is that the integral can be evaluated by taking the limit as x approaches 0 from the positive side, and it is advisable to break the integral at the point where the function crosses the x-axis at (1/3)^{3/2} to ensure the function remains non-negative.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of improper integrals
  • Familiarity with surface area calculations for solids of revolution
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically derivatives and limits
  • Ability to manipulate functions and integrals in both x and y coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Study improper integrals and their applications in calculus
  • Learn about surface area calculations for solids of revolution using the formula S.A.= Integral of( 2*pi* f(x)*\sqrt{1+f'(x)^{2}})
  • Explore integration techniques for functions that change sign within the limits of integration
  • Investigate alternative methods for calculating surface area by integrating with respect to y
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of surface area calculations for solids of revolution, particularly in cases involving improper integrals and functions with undefined derivatives.

Swallow
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hello there.
Suppose I have a function:
y=3x^{2/3}-1

I want to find the surface area of the solid formed when the part of the curve between x=0 and x=8 is revolved about the x-axis.The curve crosses the x-axis at a point (1/3)^{3/2}
The derivative of the function is:
y'=2x^{-1/3} which is undefined at x=0, so can i still find the surface area by using the limits 0 to 8 in the formula for surface area i.e.

S.A.= Integral of( 2*pi* f(x)*\sqrt{1+f'(x)^{2}}) (with limits 0 to 8).

moreover, if I can find the surface area do i have to break the integral at the point at which the function changes form negative to positive?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This probably sounds like a stupid question but given you are talking about a differential which is a sphere's surface why is it undefined at x=0.

Surely it is just dimensionless?

Sorry probably a mindless question between 0 and 8 though isn't it just a lower limit not undefined?

Might help might not to think of how the integral of a circles area or or a spheres volume relates to the derivative of a surface.
 
No Calrik, the diffrential isn't a sphere's surface, the final result (Obtained after integrating) gives you the surface area of the solid formed when that particular curve is revolved about the x-axis, AND that surface area has a definite value (it certainly isn't undefined).
Edit:
Oh and no problem, the only stupid question is the one that you don't ask. :)
 
Last edited:
Swallow said:
No Calrik, the diffrential isn't a sphere's surface, the final result (Obtained after integrating) gives you the surface area of the solid formed when that particular curve is revolved about the x-axis, AND that surface area has a definite value (it certainly isn't undefined)

Ok sorry, brain fart didn't quite understand what you were driving at.

At least I bumped your thread.

Carry on. :biggrin:

I think by topographical definition if you break the surface the calculus is non linear. That said you can stretch it to from a proof I guess.

Ie if we don't break it it defines the limits of what we can do to find an answer that is non "imaginary" if you see what I mean.

I'm probably not helping here am I, I'll get me coat. :Biggrin:
 
Last edited:
*BUMP*
Anyone?
Its a pretty straightforward question.
 
Yes, it is not uncommon to be able to integrate a function across some point where the integrand does not exist- it's an "improper" integral- take the limit as x approaches that point from each side. Here, since the point, x= 0, is one end of the range of integration, you just take the limit as x approaches 0 from above.
 
Swallow said:
Hello there.
Suppose I have a function:
y=3x^{2/3}-1

I want to find the surface area of the solid formed when the part of the curve between x=0 and x=8 is revolved about the x-axis.
The curve crosses the x-axis at a point (1/3)^{3/2}
The derivative of the function is:
y'=2x^{-1/3} which is undefined at x=0, so can i still find the surface area by using the limits 0 to 8 in the formula for surface area i.e.

S.A.= Integral of( 2*pi* f(x)*\sqrt{1+f'(x)^{2}}) (with limits 0 to 8).

moreover, if I can find the surface area do i have to break the integral at the point at which the function changes form negative to positive?

The function in your integral for surface area must be non-negative. One way to handle this is to break up the integral. Also, as you pointed out, \displaystyle y'=2x^{-1/3} is undefined at x=0, making the integral from 0 to 8 an improper integral.

S.A.= \displaystyle \lim_{a\to 0^+}\int_a^8 \left( 2\pi |f(x)|\sqrt{1+f'(x)^{2}}\right)\,dx

=\lim_{a\to 0^+}\int_a^{(1/3)^{3/2}} \left( -2\pi f(x)\sqrt{1+f'(x)^{2}}\right)\,dx \ \ +\,\int_{(1/3)^{3/2}}^8 \left( 2\pi f(x)\sqrt{1+f'(x)^{2}}\right)\,dx

As an alternative, you could integrate over y rather than x. That would eliminate having an improper integral., although you would still have to break up the integral.

In general:

S.A.= \displaystyle \int_C 2\pi |y|\ ds

If \displaystyle x=g(y), then S.A.= \displaystyle \int_{y_1}^{y_2} 2\pi|y|\sqrt{1+g'(y)}\ dy

For x ≥ 0, and y=3x^{2/3}-1, we have x=\displaystyle x=g(y)=\left({{y+1}\over{3}}\right)^{3/2}

So S.A.= \displaystyle -\int_{-1}^{0} 2\pi y\sqrt{1+g'(y)}\ dy\ \ +\int_{0}^{11} 2\pi y\sqrt{1+g'(y)}\ dy

Find \displaystyle g'(y)={{d}\over{dy}}g(y), then do the integration.

Added in edit:
I think you'll find that this integration is easier than the one over x.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K