Surface gravity as a function of luminosity?

Click For Summary
Surface gravity, defined as g = GM/R², is questioned in relation to luminosity along the main sequence. The relationship derived indicates that as luminosity increases, surface gravity appears to weaken, but this may oversimplify the problem. The discussion highlights that while mass (M) is constant, temperature (T) can vary significantly, potentially impacting surface gravity more than initially assumed. The assumption that all other variables remain constant is challenged, suggesting a more complex interaction between luminosity, temperature, and surface gravity. Overall, the relationship between these factors requires deeper exploration beyond the initial calculations.
Mr. Bond
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been using these forums for awhile but this is my first post. So thanks in advance for taking the time to consider this problem. It is much appreciated.

The question is: How does surface gravity vary as a function of luminosity along the main sequence?

By surface gravity, I'm sure the question is asking for g=\frac{G M}{R^2}. Knowing that luminosity is L=4 \pi R^2\sigma _{\text{SB}} T^4. I've solved for R in the luminosity equation and obtained g=\frac{4 \pi G M T^4 \sigma _{\text{SB}}}{L}, but I'm pretty sure the problem is supposed to be harder than this. It's obvious (according to this relationship that's probably wrong) that if luminosity increases, then the surface gravity becomes weaker. So am I looking at this problem too simplistically?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You are assuming all the other terms in the expression for g as a function of L remain constant. I am not a student of this subject, but that appears to be a very strong assumption.
 
All of them are constants except for L and possibly T. I'm pretty sure M is a constant because surface gravity is the gravity of the total mass.
 
There is no such thing as surface gravity. Gravity is always calculated based on the center of mass.
 
Mr. Bond said:
All of them are constants except for L and possibly T. I'm pretty sure M is a constant because surface gravity is the gravity of the total mass.

I suspect that the dependence on T is quite strong, weakening your original assertion.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoM-z14 Any photon with energy above 24.6 eV is going to ionize any atom. K, L X-rays would certainly ionize atoms. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/whats-the-most-distant-galaxy/ The James Webb Space Telescope has found the most distant galaxy ever seen, at the dawn of the cosmos. Again. https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/news/webb-mom-z14 A Cosmic Miracle: A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at zspec = 14.44 Confirmed with JWST...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
11K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
15K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
878
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K