Switching from Optical/Ultrafast Laser Physics to Nuclear Physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around transitioning from a background in optical and ultrafast laser physics to the fields of nuclear fission and fusion research. Participants explore pathways for entering nuclear physics, particularly in relation to plasma physics and energy development.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to shift from experimental work in optics and laser physics to nuclear fission and fusion research, seeking advice on how to make this transition.
  • Another participant suggests applying for postdoctoral positions and inquires about specific interests within nuclear research, such as structure, reactions, or applied nuclear physics.
  • It is proposed that the participant may find opportunities in plasma physics related to nuclear fusion, leveraging their existing experience with plasmas and RF technology.
  • A later reply highlights the use of optical methods in plasma research and mentions that while the nuclear physics of fusion power is largely established, challenges remain in plasma confinement.
  • One participant indicates an interest in the development of nuclear energy and particle accelerators, expressing a willingness to learn about those areas.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the relevance of plasma research to the transition into nuclear physics, but there are varying opinions on the status of nuclear fusion physics and the specific pathways to enter the field.

Contextual Notes

Participants express differing views on the state of nuclear fusion physics, with some suggesting it is well settled while others imply ongoing challenges. The discussion does not resolve the complexities of transitioning between these fields or the specific requirements for entering nuclear research.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals with a background in experimental physics, particularly in optics and plasma physics, who are considering a shift to nuclear fission or fusion research may find this discussion relevant.

Phanixis
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I recently received by Ph.D. in physics. Most of my physics experience is experimental work with optics, ultrafast laser science, laser plasma physics (relatively weakly ionized and atmospheric density plasmas), and RF and microwave experiments. However, I would really like to get involved with Nuclear Fission and Nuclear Fusion research. Is there a way for somebody with my background to enter these fields?

Thanks for the advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd guess it's the same way anyone gets into a field, apply for postdocs!

What kind of nuclear research are you interested in? Structure? Reactions? Applied nuclear physics?

Now, you might have more luck in groups that do plasma physics for nuclear fusion power generation at first (you have experience in plasmas and RF), but you could do another sideways step for the next postdoc, and so on?

If you're interested at all in synchrotron accelerators, I know that there is a fair amount of work in using optical systems for beam diagnostics. That's more accelerator physics than nuclear physics, though.
 
Thanks for the advice.

Anything directed toward the development of nuclear energy is what really interest me, although I wouldn't mind getting involved in particle accelerators and learning about those machines.
 
Well, it sounds like plasma research is the place to be for you. Lots of optical methods used there!

The nuclear physics of fusion power is pretty well settled. It's the confinement of the plasma that is the key challenge for the development of fusion power.

(That's not to say that the physics of nuclear fusion in general is solved, but that's little to do with fusion power)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K