Symmetric looking equations needing a symmetric solution

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter FrankDrebon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symmetric
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
FrankDrebon
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I have a set of equations that look very nice and symmetric, but the only way I'm able to find solutions to them is with pages and pages of algebra! Can any members with more of a mathematical flair than myself point me in the direction of a more direct and satisfactory method of solution?

The equations are:

[itex]\frac{{A_1 }}{{A_1 + A_2 + A_3 }} = \frac{{b_1 c_1 }}{{b_1 c_1 + b_2 c_2 + b_3 c_3 }}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{{A_2 }}{{A_1 + A_2 + A_3 }} = \frac{{b_2 c_2 }}{{b_1 c_1 + b_2 c_2 + b_3 c_3 }}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{{A_3 }}{{A_1 + A_2 + A_3 }} = \frac{{b_3 c_3 }}{{b_1 c_1 + b_2 c_2 + b_3 c_3 }}[/itex]

Given that:

[itex]b_1 + b_2 + b_3 = 1[/itex]

I am looking to express [itex]b_1[/itex], [itex]b_2[/itex] and [itex]b_3[/itex] in terms of [itex]A_1[/itex], [itex]A_2[/itex], [itex]A_3[/itex], [itex]c_1[/itex], [itex]c_2[/itex] and [itex]c_3[/itex].

In general, I guess the problem would be:

[itex]A_i \sum\limits_j {b_j c_j } = b_i c_i \sum\limits_j {A_j }[/itex]

[itex]\sum\limits_j {b_j } = 1[/itex]

I have solved the problem for the [itex]j = 2[/itex] case, with the neat looking solutions:

[itex]b_1 = \frac{{A_1 c_2 }}{{A_1 c_2 + A_2 c_1 }}[/itex]

[itex]b_2 = \frac{{A_2 c_1 }}{{A_1 c_2 + A_2 c_1 }}[/itex]

I'm looking for similar solutions to [itex]j = 3[/itex], or more...if a general solution is obvious to someone else!

Any ideas?

Thanks in advance,

FD
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'll write your equations as:

[Eqs. 1] [tex]\frac{A_i}{\sum_j Aj} = \frac {b_i c_i}{\sum_j b_j c_j}[/tex]


Introduce another variable [itex]\theta[/itex] defined by

[Eq. 2] [tex]\theta = \frac {\sum_j b_j c_j} {\sum_j A_j}[/tex]

Multiplying the left sides of [Eqs. 1] by [itex]\frac{\theta}{\theta}[/itex] gives:

[Eqs. 3] [tex]\frac{\theta A_i}{\sum_j b_j c_j} = \frac {b_i c_i}{\sum_j b_j c_j}[/tex]

so

[Eqs 4] [tex]b_i = \theta \frac{A_i}{c_i}[/tex]


Since [itex]\sum_j b_j = 1[/itex] we have:

[Eq 5] [tex]\sum_j \theta \frac{A_j}{c_j} = \theta \sum_j {A_j}{c_j} = 1[/tex]

Sovling for [itex]\theta[/itex] gives:

[Eq 6] [tex]\theta = \frac{1}{\sum_j \frac{A_j}{c_j}}[/tex]

Substituting in [Eqs 4] gives

[Eqs 7] [tex]b_i = \frac{1}{\sum_j \frac{A_j}{c_j}} \frac{A_i}{c_i}[/tex]

Of course, you must check none of the steps involve division by zero. Also my reasoning seems suspiciously circular!
 
Ahhhh, that works beautifully - nice one!
 
That was an elegant solution, I would like to add another one.
Dividing the sides of the ith equation by the sides of the jth equation gives:
[tex]\frac{A_i}{A_j}=\frac{b_ic_i}{b_jc_j}[/tex]
And then:
[tex]b_j=\frac{A_j}{c_j}\frac{c_i}{A_i}b_i[/tex]
Thus:
[tex]\sum_{j}b_j=\frac{c_i}{A_i}b_i\sum_{j}\frac{A_j}{c_j}[/tex]
And since [itex]\sum_{j}b_j=1[/itex] we get:
[tex]b_i=\frac{A_i}{c_i}\frac{1}{\sum_{j}\frac{A_j}{c_j}}[/tex]