Symmetrical component example: can't understand solution

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding symmetrical components and the calculations involved in determining the zero sequence circuit from a specific example in Stevenson's Power System Analysis. The user is confused about the calculation of reactance for transformers T1 and T2, particularly regarding the change of bases and the method used for T2. It is clarified that T1's reactance is calculated using the ratio of MVA ratings since both T1 and the generator share the same voltage rating. In contrast, T2's reactance is adjusted based on its own ratings and the motor circuit voltage level, which requires a different approach. Overall, the thread highlights the importance of understanding the basis for calculating per unit reactance in power systems.
ffp
Messages
96
Reaction score
5
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
Ok, now I'm studying symmetrical components. Im using Stevenson's Power System Analysis book and example 11.9 asks for the zero sequence circuit of the example 6.1 in the same book.

Here's the example and the solution:
SmartSelect_20230123_225052_Moon+ Reader Pro.jpg

Here's example 6.1, so we can see what is the circuit:
SmartSelect_20230123_225223_Moon+ Reader Pro.jpg


Here's the beggining of the solution, where I'm stuck...

SmartSelect_20230123_225443_Moon+ Reader Pro.jpg


I believe de X of T1 (0.0857 pu) is found by changing bases (Xpu=OLDpu x OLDbase/NEWbase). So 0.1 is the pu of T1, 300 is the Sbase (MVA) of the generator (and hence, system) and 350 is the Sbase (MVA) of T1. Is that right?

If so, why is X of T2 calculated differently, I believe by reflecting impedances? If that's really what he's doing, why is he using 13.2 and 13.8?

I'm really lost here with this example.
 

Attachments

  • SmartSelect_20230123_225052_Moon+ Reader Pro.jpg
    SmartSelect_20230123_225052_Moon+ Reader Pro.jpg
    21.1 KB · Views: 131
  • SmartSelect_20230123_225223_Moon+ Reader Pro.jpg
    SmartSelect_20230123_225223_Moon+ Reader Pro.jpg
    52 KB · Views: 110
Physics news on Phys.org
ffp said:
I believe de X of T1 (0.0857 pu) is found by changing bases (Xpu=OLDpu x OLDbase/NEWbase). So 0.1 is the pu of T1, 300 is the Sbase (MVA) of the generator (and hence, system) and 350 is the Sbase (MVA) of T1. Is that right?
Yes. Both T1 and the generator have the same voltage rating(and are at the same voltage level in the line diagram). This is why only the ratio of MVA ratings is used to find the new pu reactance.
ffp said:
If so, why is X of T2 calculated differently
The MVA rating of T2 is same as the base MVA (300MVA). The 0.1 pu reactance of T2 is w.r.t its own ratings (300MVA, 13.2kV). To convert it properly according to the motor citcuit voltage level, it is divided by the motor circuit voltage level (and then squared).
 
Thread 'Why wasn’t gravity included in the potential energy for this problem?'
I’m looking at the attached vibration problem. The solution in the manual includes the spring potential energy but does NOT include the gravitational potential energy of the hanging mass. Can someone explain why gravitational potential energy is not included when deriving the equation of motion? I tried asking ChatGPT but kept going in circles and couldn't figure out. Thanks!

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
592
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K