Symmetries of 6-Gon: Proving D_6 isomorphic to D_3 x Z_2

  • Thread starter Thread starter CAF123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symmetries
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the isomorphism between the dihedral group \(D_6\) and the product of groups \(D_3 \times \mathbb{Z}_2\). The original poster seeks to understand if a similar argument can be applied to \(D_n\) for even \(n \geq 6\), specifically questioning the structure of \(D_n\) in relation to subgroups and their properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions under which subgroups \(H\) and \(K\) can be formed, particularly focusing on their orders and intersections. There is an exploration of whether the argument used for \(D_6\) can be generalized to \(D_n\). Questions arise regarding the nature of normal subgroups and their relevance to the isomorphism.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering insights into subgroup properties and questioning the necessity of normality in the context of the isomorphism. Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions and implications of normal subgroups, while others suggest focusing on specific elements and their orders within the groups.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of familiarity with certain group concepts among participants, particularly regarding normal subgroups and centers, which may affect their ability to engage fully with the problem. The original poster indicates that the question was posed early in their studies, suggesting potential gaps in foundational knowledge.

CAF123
Gold Member
Messages
2,918
Reaction score
87

Homework Statement


We were given the following argument showing that ##D_6 \cong D_3 \times \mathbb{Z}_2##.
What we did was take two subgroups H and K of G such that their intersection was trivial and that ##hk = kh## for all h and k. H = {symmetries of 6-gon that preserved a triangle inside} and K = <g3>. By some theorem, we proved this shows that HK is isomorphic to H x K which in turn is isomorphic to ##D_3 \times \mathbb{Z}_2##

The question is: Does a similar argument apply to ##D_n## where n is even ##\geq 6##?

The Attempt at a Solution



I presume the question is asking if we can write ##D_n \cong D_x \times \mathbb{Z}_y## for some x and y?

What I have done so far is the following:
Let G = Dn. Choose H and K such that |H| . |K| = 2n. For the above argument to work, necessarily H and K are subgroups of G. So by Lagrange, the orders of H and K have to divide the order of Dn. This means: $$|D_n| = a|H|, |D_n| = b|K|\,\Rightarrow\,a|H| = b|K|.$$Since H and K are subgroups, they are subsets so H,K contained in G. But since we want the intersection to be trivial (i.e ##H \cap K = \left\{e\right\}##, we have that ##|H| \neq |K|##. I am not sure if this helps me at all and I am unsure of how to proceed.

Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any ideas? Or is my question difficult to understand?
 
I understand that D_6 is the dihedral group of order 6?
But what do you mean with D_3?
 
Oh, you're using the notation that the order of D_n is 2n. I get it.
 
Maybe we should focus first on whether

D_{2n}\sim D_n\times \mathbb{Z}_2

Can you determine centers of both groups? Thus, can you tell me what Z(D_{2n}) and what Z(D_n\times \mathbb{Z}_2)is?
 
micromass said:
I understand that D_6 is the dihedral group of order 6?
But what do you mean with D_3?
H turned out to have the same number of elements as ##D_3##. So we then said there existed an isomorphism ##H \cong D_3## and this led to the conclusion.
 
micromass said:
Maybe we should focus first on whether

D_{2n}\sim D_n\times \mathbb{Z}_2

Can you determine centers of both groups? Thus, can you tell me what Z(D_{2n}) and what Z(D_n\times \mathbb{Z}_2)is?

Hi micromass,

We covered centres right at the end of our course and I am not familiar with that Z notation. I am doing some revision and this question came quite early on, just after subgroups, cyclic groups, homormorphisms. Is there a way to do it using this?
 
OK, so let's say that D_{2n}\sim D_n\times \mathbb{Z}_2.

So then we can write D_{2n}=HK with H\cap K=\{0\} and where H and K are both normal. Furthermore, H\sim D_nand K\sim \mathbb{Z}_2.

So if it were true that we could write this, then in particular, we could find a normal subgroup of D_{2n} that has order 2. Can you find me all normal subgroups of order 2 in D_{2n}?? Maybe you can start by listing all elements of order 2, and then see if they generate something normal.
 
micromass said:
OK, so let's say that D_{2n}\sim D_n\times \mathbb{Z}_2.

So then we can write D_{2n}=HK with H\cap K=\{0\} and where H and K are both normal.

Why do they have to be normal?

Furthermore, H\sim D_nand K\sim \mathbb{Z}_2.

So if it were true that we could write this, then in particular, we could find a normal subgroup of D_{2n} that has order 2. Can you find me all normal subgroups of order 2 in D_{2n}?? Maybe you can start by listing all elements of order 2, and then see if they generate something normal.

Thanks for your reply, but we didn't really do much with normal subgroups, so I am struggling even to understand why what you said above is true. We had a sort of introductory lecture on things like centres/normal subgroups/class eqn/conjugacy etc..but didn't go into too much detail. Perhaps the element ##h## would have order 2, but I cannot be sure whether this would hold for all even n
 
  • #10
CAF123 said:
Why do they have to be normal?

Because both D_n (or more precisely: D_n\times\{0\}) and \mathbb{Z}_2 (or more precisely: \{e\}\times \mathbb{Z}_2) are normal in D_n\times \mathbb{Z}_2. The subgroups of D_{2n} corresponding to D_n (respectively \mathbb{Z}_2) are H (respectively K). So they need to be normal.

Thanks for your reply, but we didn't really do much with normal subgroups, so I am struggling even to understand why what you said above is true. We had a sort of introductory lecture on things like centres/normal subgroups/class eqn/conjugacy etc..but didn't go into too much detail. Perhaps the element ##h## would have order 2, but I cannot be sure whether this would hold for all even n

But let's say we have the following isomorphism: T:D_n\times \mathbb{Z}_2\rightarrow D_{2n}, then (e,1) has order 2 in D_n\times \mathbb{Z}_2 and thus so has T(e,1). And T(e,1) exactly generates H.

Since you seem to be struggling with basic concepts, I think you have misinterpreted the question. You seem to have interpreted the question as: is D_{2n}\cong D_x\times \mathbb{Z}_y. I don't think this is the way you should interpret it.

I think the question asks you to generalize the exact proof of D_6\sim D_3\times \mathbb{Z}_2 to the context D_{2n}\sim D_n\times \mathbb{Z}_2. And they ask whether that proof is still valid. I don't think they want you to actually show the result in general. They just want you to see if the generalization of the proof is valid.
It might be worth contacting your professor and asking him for more clarificiations on the question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K