Symmetry factor of a Wick diagram

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the symmetry factor of a Wick diagram involving a hermitian field and a complex field, as presented in the book "Quantum Field for Mathematicians." The symmetry factor is confirmed to be 2 due to the existence of two automorphisms related to the hermitian propagator loop. The participants clarify that while "a" and "d" can only map to themselves, the direction of the hermitian loop can be altered without changing the diagram, thus establishing the symmetry. Additionally, a participant corrects their earlier confusion regarding the double bubble diagram, which has a symmetry factor of 8.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Wick diagrams in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with symmetry factors in Feynman diagrams
  • Knowledge of hermitian and complex fields
  • Basic concepts of automorphisms in mathematical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of symmetry factors in Feynman diagrams
  • Explore the properties of hermitian fields in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the role of automorphisms in quantum diagrams
  • Learn about the implications of symmetry factors on particle interactions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying quantum field theory, particularly those interested in the calculations involving Wick diagrams and symmetry factors.

pscplaton
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Hello !

In the book Quantum Field for mathematician, there is this Wick diagram as an example to understand how to compute the symmetry factor (I am sorry, I draw it with paint...)

wick diagram.png


This is about a hermitian field interacting with a complex field. The book says it has a symmetry factor of 2 but I don't understand why, even after reading about symmetry factor on wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feynman_diagram#Symmetry_factors). I don't see what are the two automorphisms of this Feynman diagram... As far as I understand, for a given automorphism, "a" can only be mapped to "a" because of the complex field loop, and the same applies for "d". "c" cannot be mapped to "b" because it has incoming complex propagator from "a", which is not the case of "b"...

Where am I wrong ?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
d is not a complex propagator loop, it has no arrow.
 
Yes you are right. I mean that like "a", "d" can only be mapped to itself, because it has a hermitian propagator loop attached, and this is the only hermitian propagator loop of the diagram
 
This is the point, you can make the symmetry transformation of changing the direction of this loop without changing the diagram. Hence a symmetry factor of 2.
 
Thanks for your reply.

But then I don't understand why the double bubble diagram has a symmetry factor of 2.
bubble.png

According to what you are saying, it should have a symmetry factor of 4, shouldn't it ?

edit: Sorry I was confused. It works. There is actually a symmetry factor of 8
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K