Synthesizing Petroleum Oil from Plants: A Feasibility Study

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the feasibility of synthesizing petroleum oil from genetically engineered plants, exploring the potential for such plants to meet global oil demands. It encompasses theoretical considerations, historical context, and alternative energy sources.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose genetically engineered plants that could synthesize petroleum oil from hydrogen and carbon, questioning the practicality and scalability of such an approach.
  • Others reference historical uses of plant oils as substitutes for petroleum, noting that certain oils, like coconut oil, could produce high-octane biodiesel, while others like soybeans and corn may require genetic modification to yield shorter carbon-chain oils.
  • One participant raises concerns about the limitations of plant oils, stating that the longest natural fatty acid chains are only 22 carbons long, and questions whether synthetic methods could produce longer chains effectively.
  • There is mention of the potential for future technologies, such as nanotechnology, to improve synthesis methods, though some express caution regarding the safety of synthesized materials not found in nature.
  • A participant introduces the concept of the Copaiba Langsdorfii tree, which produces a sap similar to diesel, suggesting it as a natural alternative fuel source, particularly in tropical climates.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some agreeing on the potential of genetically engineered plants while others highlight limitations and concerns. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the feasibility and safety of synthesizing petroleum oil from plants.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the energy intensity of synthesis processes and the need for significant demand to justify such investments. There are also concerns about the ecological and health implications of synthetic materials.

SkepticJ
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
An idea I had some weeks ago is genetically engineered plants that synthesize petroleum oil from hydrogen and carbon. If the need for such a thing was upon us in the next few years, how hard would it be to create oil-gourds, bamboo, algae etc.? Also to what level could huge fields of such plants cope with the world's oil needs?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
You and some bright scientists are both on the same track.
In 2000, Bernie Tao at Purdue talked about using plants oils, as a viable substitute for petroleum. Coconut oil and other tropical oils could make a high octane biodiesel fuel, because they produce oils with relatively short carbon-chains. Soybeans and corn are two of the highest oil-yeilding plants but they make oils with longer carbon-chains and would require additional energy to process them into a gasoline-like fuel. However they could be genetically modified to yield shorter carbon-chain oils.

There are many industries dependent on petroleum resources beside transportation and energy. They are used in paints, laquer, printing inks, adhesives, plastics, synthetic rubber, asphalt, polish, candles, clothing, medicine and a host of other products. Prior to World War II, plant oils were used to make many of these products.

As far as coping with world oil needs, we have so many other useful energy alternatives (solar, wind, geothermal, tidal, hydroelectric and fuel cells) that become cost effective as petroleum supplies are depleted.
 
Last edited:
Ouabache said:
You and some bright scientists are both on the same track.
In 2000, Bernie Tao at Purdue talked about using plants oils, as a viable substitute for petroleum. Coconut oil and other tropical oils could make a high octane biodiesel fuel, because they produce oils with long carbon-chains. Soybeans and corn are two of the highest oil-yeilding plants but do not make sufficiently long carbon-chains to make gasoline-like fuel. However they could be genetically modified to yield longer carbon-chain oils.


The link says we'll always need petroleum oil to produce some kinds of plastics, why is that? Can't the hydrocarbon cains from these plants be built up into longer lengths like petroleum oil is? It's all the same chemical structure, except length. What's the problem with that?
This also forgets about Drexler style nanotechnological assemblers which will exist oneday.
 
The carbon chains in plant oils are longest, in the fatty acid chains. All the natural ones, at largest are only 22 Carbons long. Perhaps some biochemists can lend some more insight. I don't believe plants can make a fatty acids 200 C's long.
Personally, I think once we run out of petroleum, we will get along fine without it. We are pretty ingenious creatures and can find other materials to work with.

Synthesis may be another alternative in making hydrocarbons of prescribed chain lengths, but is very energy intensive. There would have to be a great need for the end product (e.g. medicine) for that kind of investment. Future technologies (like nanotechnology which you mentioned) may offer even more efficient methods of synthesis.

We need to take caution, in synthesizing all sorts of materials, not produced in nature. Our bodies did not evolve in their presence and may be potentially harmful to us.
 
Ouabache said:
We need to take caution, in synthesizing all sorts of materials, not produced in nature. Our bodies did not evolve in their presence and may be potentially harmful to us.


That's what animal testing is for:) Sure, it makes me sad to see plastic bottles out in the woods that have been there for longer than I've been alive. Plastics can build things you really don't want to rot however. Also medical like you said. That stuff wouldn't work if it was made of cast iron, woven hemp fibers etc.
 
The Copaiba Langsdorfii, an Amazonian tree, produces a sap which is so similar to diesel that it can be poured straight into a truck's fuel tank.
http://www.the-tree.org.uk/EnchantedForest/wyrd2.htm

...Just as cows give drinkable milk, trees can yield fuel pure enough to be burned in diesel engines. Dubbed the diesel tree, Brazil's Cobaifera tree is the Guernsey of the forest, each mature tree being able to produce 30 to 40 liters (8 to 10 U.S. gallons) per year.

Though not likely to become a significant source of diesel fuel in temperate climates, in the tropics Cobaifera plantations might produce as much as 25 barrels of fuel per year. Still, Cobaifera relatives in the same genus, Euphorbia, are producing 10 barrels per acre in northern California...
http://www.gi.alaska.edu/ScienceForum/ASF3/358.html

Twenty years ago, when I first mentioned this tree to my workmates I was nearly laughed out of the room. :biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
25K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K