System of equilibrium, why won't the normal force apply?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of normal force in a system involving a ring and a string. Participants clarify that while the ring does contact the string, the normal force is considered internal and thus excluded from the equilibrium equations. The tension in the string can be accurately determined using a free body diagram that accounts for the weight of the ring and the tension forces, while the normal force cancels out in the calculations. This understanding is crucial for solving problems related to equilibrium in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of free body diagrams (FBD)
  • Knowledge of equilibrium conditions in physics
  • Familiarity with tension forces in strings
  • Basic concepts of forces including weight and normal force
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in physics
  • Learn how to construct and analyze free body diagrams
  • Explore the relationship between tension and normal forces in various systems
  • Investigate examples of systems with multiple forces acting simultaneously
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts of forces and equilibrium in their teaching materials.

SmamMir
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



208670-ec244440bee12f7c3ec022a2b6b33841.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I've resolved all the relevant forces (tension, weight, normal force), but upon looking at the mark scheme, there is no normal force to be resolved.
Forgive me if I'm missing out on something obvious, but shouldn't there be a normal force opposing the weight?
 

Attachments

  • mechanics.PNG
    mechanics.PNG
    12.5 KB · Views: 530
Physics news on Phys.org
SmamMir said:

Homework Statement



208670-ec244440bee12f7c3ec022a2b6b33841.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I've resolved all the relevant forces (tension, weight, normal force), but upon looking at the mark scheme, there is no normal force to be resolved.
Forgive me if I'm missing out on something obvious, but shouldn't there be a normal force opposing the weight?
Show your work, please. Draw the forces exerted on the ring.
 
ehild said:
Show your work, please. Draw the forces exerted on the ring.
Re-did as neatly as I could.
Negating the normal normal force would allow me to easily find out the tension (as it should be?), but I can't quite grasp the logic behind it.
 

Attachments

  • mech2.jpg
    mech2.jpg
    41.6 KB · Views: 510
Are you looking for something besides string tension? The string tension can be found using a free body diagram at joint R.
 
PhanthomJay said:
Are you looking for something besides string tension? The string tension can be found using a free body diagram at joint R.
No, just the string tension.
I tried, and accounted for the normal force, but the mark scheme doesn't. My only query is: why?
 

Attachments

  • mech2.jpg
    mech2.jpg
    41.6 KB · Views: 527
SmamMir said:
Re-did as neatly as I could.
Negating the normal normal force would allow me to easily find out the tension (as it should be?), but I can't quite grasp the logic behind it.
What do you call R? there are no other forces but the tension in the string and the weight of the ring.
 
ehild said:
What do you call R? there are no other forces but the tension in the string and the weight of the ring.
The normal force?
My only question is, why won't there be a normal force? The ring does come in contact (rests on) with the ring.
 
SmamMir said:
The normal force?
My only question is, why won't there be a normal force? The ring does come in contact (rests on) with the ring.
The ring comes in contact with the string, and both pieces of the string act on it with the tension. The horizontal components of the tension forces cancel, and the vertical components add, and that balances the weight of the ring.
 
You may be thinking that normal force is the bearing force of the string in contact with the ring. That is a valid (although not usual) way of looking at it. But when you draw a free body diagram of the ring, you have the weight force and the tension forces acting on it. The "normal" force is internal in that diagram, and thus excluded in the equilibrium equations. You only look at external forces and internal forces that are "cut" free from the system. To find the 'normal force' you need to look at a different free body diagram which is a bit hard to find. The normal force ends up being equal to the weight of the ring. But don't include it in your original diagram!
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Think of it this way. You are asked to find the tension in a string which is assumed massless. OK, then consider as your system the ring plus a little piece of the string that loops around the ring and has two ends on either side. The only forces acting on this system are the two tensions at each end of the string that is now the system and the weight of the ring. The "normal" force exerted by the string on the ring is equal and opposite to the "normal" force exerted by the ring on the string, so they cancel out. Remember that you can choose as your system anything you wish and, as long as all forces are accounted for properly and the correct equations are obtained from the FBD, who's to say that one system is more appropriate than another?
 
  • #11
Now I understand the OP's problem.
The ring with the string can be considered as two systems. One the ring with the small piece of the string in contact with it (the red spot)
The other one is the small piece and the two branches of the string.
The forces acting on the ring are its weight and the normal force from the red piece of string. N-W=0
The forces acting on the small red piece are the tension forces and the normal force from the ring. 2Ty-N=0
Adding up these equations, N cancels.

upload_2018-5-13_6-5-38.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-5-13_6-5-38.png
    upload_2018-5-13_6-5-38.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 432

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K