System of linear equations with fractions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a system of linear equations that includes fractions. Participants explore methods for simplifying the equations to facilitate solving.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the elimination method and its applicability with fractional coefficients. There is a suggestion to clear denominators to simplify the equations, with questions about the correct approach to do so. Some participants clarify the process of multiplying entire equations rather than individual terms.

Discussion Status

Guidance has been offered regarding the elimination method and the process of clearing fractions. Multiple interpretations of how to approach the problem are being explored, particularly concerning the method of clearing denominators.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that while clearing fractions may simplify the initial setup, it could lead back to fractions during the solving process, raising questions about the efficiency of this approach.

Chase
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve the following system of linear equations.

##\begin{array}{cc} \frac{1}{2}x+y-\frac{3}{4}z=1

\\ \frac{2}{3}x-\frac{1}{3}y+z=2

\\ x-\frac{1}{5}y+2z=1 \end{array}##

The Attempt at a Solution


Can I just do elimination by addition? So if I multiple the first equation by ##\frac{1}{3}## I get ##\frac{1}{3}\left(\frac{1}{2}x\right)+\frac{1}{3}y+\frac{1}{3}\left(-\frac{3}{4}\right)=\frac{1}{3}## then I can add this to the second equation to eliminate the y's?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yep, elimination works with fractions just like it does for whole number coefficients. It also works with decimal coefficients as well, just not as neatly.
 
SteamKing said:
Yep, elimination works with fractions just like it does for whole number coefficients. It also works with decimal coefficients as well, just not as neatly.

In my book it suggests to try clearing the denominators first to make it easier. To do this do you just multiply each term by the lowest commom number? So in my case I would multiply the first term by 2 to clear the 2, the second term by 4 giving 4y, leaving the third term as it is and then finally the 1 giving 4?
 
Chase said:
In my book it suggests to try clearing the denominators first to make it easier. To do this do you just multiply each term by the lowest commom number? So in my case I would multiply the first term by 2 to clear the 2, the second term by 4 giving 4y, leaving the third term as it is and then finally the 1 giving 4?

You don't multiply every term by a different number. You multiply every equation by a different number. Multiply the first equation by 4, then second by 3 and the third by 5. Do you see why?
 
Dick said:
You don't multiply every term by a different number. You multiply every equation by a different number. Multiply the first equation by 4, then second by 3 and the third by 5. Do you see why?
Yes, to clear the fractions. When I multiply each equation as you said I'll end up with

\begin{array}{cc} 2x+4y-3z=4

\\ 2x-y+3z=6

\\ 5x-y+10z=5 \end{array}

?
 
Last edited:
Chase said:
Yes, to clear the fractions. When I multiply each equation as you said I'll end up with

\begin{array}{cc} 2x+4y-3z=4

\\ 2x-y+3z=6

\\ 5x-y+10z=5 \end{array}

?

Looks fine.

BTW, using LaTeX here is overkill. You can write it in plain old text.

2x+4y-3z=4
2x-y+3z=6
5x-y+10z=5
 
Chase said:
Yes, to clear the fractions. When I multiply each equation as you said I'll end up with

\begin{array}{cc} 2x+4y-3z=4

\\ 2x-y+3z=6

\\ 5x-y+10z=5 \end{array}

?

This is correct. However, clearing fractions like that may be a big waste of time, since as soon as you start to solve the equations you will be back to fractions again.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K