System of ODEs independent solutions

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
bmxicle
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


so I'm trying to find the general solution of this problem:
[tex]\mathbf {x'} = \begin{bmatrix} 2 & 0\\0 & 2\end{bmatrix}\mathbf{x}[/tex]


Homework Equations


det(A- rI) = 0


The Attempt at a Solution


[tex]det(A - rI) = det \begin{bmatrix} 2-r & 0 \\ 0 & 2-r \end{bmatrix} =<br /> (2-r)^{2} = 0 \Rightarrow r = 2[/tex]
[tex]A - 2I = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \ \ \[/tex]
So since the nullspace is [tex]\mathbb{R}^{2}[/tex] Two linearly independent eigenvectors are:
[tex]\mathbf{v_{1}} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix} \ \ \ \ \mathbf{v_{2}} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 \\1 \end{bmatrix}[/tex]

So this is where i get confused :p. One solution is of course [tex]\mathbf{x_1} = e^{2t}\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}[/tex] However when i tried to find a solution such that [tex]\mathbf{x_2} = te^{2t} \begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}(\mathbf{a}t + \mathbf{b})[/tex] It comes out inconsistent so I'm guessing that's not what you're supposed to do in this case. Another idea i had was that [tex]\mathbf{x_2} = e^{2t} \begin{bmatrix}0\\1\end{bmatrix}[/tex] is also an independent solution since the vector is linearly independent from the other solution, but I'm not entirely sure how to verify this by the wronskian for a system of equations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bmxicle said:
One solution is of course [tex]\mathbf{x_1} = e^{2t}\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}[/tex]
bmxicle said:
Another idea i had was that [tex]\mathbf{x_2} = e^{2t} \begin{bmatrix}0\\1\end{bmatrix}[/tex] is also an independent solution since the vector is linearly independent from the other solution
That is the solution.

You get the "normal modes" of this two-variable system in the form of an eigenvector multiplied by the same exp(rt).

ehild
 
hmmm ok, I that makes enough sense, though need to do some more reading. Can you compute the wronskian as the determinant of the matrix of the spanning vectors, ie. [tex]W = e^{4t} \neq 0[/tex]
 
:confused: You do say you are only trying to find the solution. But if I have not misunderstood this is almost trivial - you have two independent elementary d.e.'s, x1' = 2x1, x2' = 2x2.

If instead you are trying to show it works out in accord with the Higher Theory, Wronskians etc. then I forget these between times and cannot help. :redface:
 
yes well looking at it now it definitely is almost trivial. I'm just a little hazy as to what constitutes an indepedent solution to a system of equations I guess.