System turns on alarm once temp. dips below 10.5°C

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework problem related to a temperature monitoring system that activates an alarm when the temperature drops below 10.5°C. Participants explore the circuit analysis, thermistor behavior, and the implications of various parameters on the system's performance.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the choice of delta T = 0.25°C, suggesting it may be an arbitrary decision to minimize thermistor heating compared to temperature changes.
  • There is a call for detailed circuit analysis, particularly regarding the hysteresis requirement for the system to turn on and off at specified temperatures.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of the 5mW/°C dissipation constant and its role in maintaining the thermistor's self-heating within acceptable limits.
  • Another participant points out that the 10kΩ resistance is defined in the problem as the thermistor's resistance at 10°C, raising questions about its relevance to the overall circuit analysis.
  • Concerns are raised about the equivalent resistance seen by the thermistor, with a suggestion that it should be greater than 4.2kΩ to limit current appropriately.
  • One participant notes that the circuit configuration may not be accurately represented, particularly regarding the relationship between the 4.2kΩ and 9kΩ resistors.
  • There is a clarification regarding the circuit configuration, asserting that the 4.2kΩ and 9kΩ resistors are not in parallel and discussing the implications for current flow.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance and interpretation of specific parameters and circuit configurations. There is no consensus on the correctness of the presented solution or the analysis of the circuit.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions and dependencies in their analysis, including the impact of heat-sinking on thermistor behavior and the need for careful evaluation of circuit components. The discussion reflects unresolved mathematical steps and differing interpretations of the problem statement.

adamaero
Messages
109
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


upload_2018-4-7_21-19-55.png
upload_2018-4-7_21-19-35.png


Homework Equations


upload_2018-4-7_21-20-3.png

(Above given. I think it's a hint.)

The Attempt at a Solution


upload_2018-4-7_21-20-41.png

How is delta T = 0.25??
Where is the 10kΩ coming from?

We were given a solution for this homework, since it's not collected. It just seems out of order.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-4-7_21-18-43.png
    upload_2018-4-7_21-18-43.png
    13.9 KB · Views: 552
  • upload_2018-4-7_21-19-35.png
    upload_2018-4-7_21-19-35.png
    3 KB · Views: 778
  • upload_2018-4-7_21-19-55.png
    upload_2018-4-7_21-19-55.png
    8.2 KB · Views: 791
  • upload_2018-4-7_21-20-3.png
    upload_2018-4-7_21-20-3.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 803
  • upload_2018-4-7_21-20-41.png
    upload_2018-4-7_21-20-41.png
    14 KB · Views: 834
Physics news on Phys.org
adamaero said:
How is delta T = 0.25??
This looks like an arbitrary choice to keep the heating of the thermistor small compared to the monitored temperature changes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: adamaero
This requires detailed circuit analysis including the hysteresis requirement (on at 10.5C on the way up., off at 8C on the way down). Thefone parameter you can ignore is the 5mW/C "dissipation constant". Unfortunately the presented solution seem to have taken off with it ... I find the given solution totally irrelevant and incomprehensible.
 
Actually that 5mW/°C and ΔT=0.25C is important in practice. The problem statement gives an overall 0.5°C tolerance so the usual approach is to limit the thermistor self heating to half (or less) of the allowed error band, leaving room for tolerance buildup of the other components. "I", the maximum thermistor current, is correctly calculated as 0.354mA

The 10k is defined in the problem statement as the thermistor resistance at 10°C.

I haven't evaluated the rest of the circuit in detail but it doesn't look right. For instance the equivalent resistance the thermistor sees should be ≥4.2kΩ to limit the thermistor current, but the circuit shows 4.2k and 9k in parallel.

The hysteresis still needs calculating.
 
OK, but that number is not characteristic of the thermistor itself. It depends on the degree of heat-sinking to the measured ambient. So if the given number is somehow determined in situ then I guess that number can be incorporated into the calculations.
 
Tom.G said:
but the circuit shows 4.2k and 9k in parallel.
They are not in parallel. There shouldn't be a relevant current through the 9 kOhm resistor around the nominal temperature. The negative side of the comparator is held at the same voltage we have between thermistor and 4.2 kOhm resistor at this temperature.
 
mfb said:
They are not in parallel. There shouldn't be a relevant current through the 9 kOhm resistor around the nominal temperature. The negative side of the comparator is held at the same voltage we have between thermistor and 4.2 kOhm resistor at this temperature.
You're right. Thanks. I had stopped my evaluation before getting there. :oops:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K