MHB Systems of equations - further understanding

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding systems of equations, particularly the conditions for solutions based on the relationships between parameters a, b, and c. It concludes that for the given system, infinite solutions occur when 2a - b + c = 0, while no solutions arise when this expression is not equal to zero, with a unique solution being impossible. Additionally, the rank-nullity theorem is referenced to determine the degrees of freedom for the solutions of Ax = 0, indicating that the nullity is related to the rank of the matrix. Lastly, the discussion addresses the implications of having infinite solutions for one equation on the existence of solutions for another, ultimately affirming the connection between these conditions.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello again,

I have a few more questions regarding systems of equations, I will collect them all here in one post since they are small.

1. The first is the following system:

x+2y-3z=a
3x-y+2z=b
x-5y+8z=c

I need to determine the relation between a,b and c for which the system has infinite solution, unique solution or no solution. I did some row operations and got:

\[\begin{pmatrix} 1 &2 &-3 &a \\ 0 &-7 &11 &b-3a \\ 0 &0 &0 &2a-b+c \end{pmatrix}\]

I conclude that when 2a-b+c=0 there is an infinite solution and when it ain't equal 0, there is no solution. A unique solution is not possible. However, Maple got the same matrix but claims that there is no solution either way...is it a computer bug or I am mistaken ?

2. A is a matrix over the R field with dimensions 3X4. The rank of A is 1. How many degrees of freedom (parameters, i.e. t,s,...) does the family of solutions of Ax=0 has ?

3. If Ax=b has infinite solution, then Ax=c has infinite solution or no solution. True or False ?

Thanks a lot !
:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yankel said:
Hello again,

I have a few more questions regarding systems of equations, I will collect them all here in one post since they are small.

1. The first is the following system:

x+2y-3z=a
3x-y+2z=b
x-5y+8z=c

I need to determine the relation between a,b and c for which the system has infinite solution, unique solution or no solution. I did some row operations and got:

\[\begin{pmatrix} 1 &2 &-3 &a \\ 0 &-7 &11 &b-3a \\ 0 &0 &0 &2a-b+c \end{pmatrix}\]

I conclude that when 2a-b+c=0 there is an infinite solution and when it ain't equal 0, there is no solution. A unique solution is not possible. However, Maple got the same matrix but claims that there is no solution either way...is it a computer bug or I am mistaken ?

2. A is a matrix over the R field with dimensions 3X4. The rank of A is 1. How many degrees of freedom (parameters, i.e. t,s,...) does the family of solutions of Ax=0 has ?

3. If Ax=b has infinite solution, then Ax=c has infinite solution or no solution. True or False ?

Thanks a lot !
:)
Hello,

1. For it to be infinity soloution you want them to be linear dependen
2. Dim ker (A) Tells you how many parameters there is,

edit: 1. Yes it looks correct for me what you Said

notice that I have not checked your progress!

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
Last edited:
Umm...don't trust computers, they lie to you.

OBVIOUSLY, there is the solution (0,0,0) when a = b = c = 0. perhaps not as obviously, there are also the solutions of the form:

t(-1,11,7) for any real number t, when a = b = c = 0.

Thus given some vector (a,b,c) for which 2a - b + c = 0 (like, for example: (1,1,-1)), we can conclude we have the infinite number of solutions:

(2/7,13/7,1) + t(-1,11,7), since:

A(2/7,13/7,1) = (2/7 + 26/7 - 3, 6/7 - 13/7 + 2,2/7 - 65/7 + 8) = (1,1,-1) and

A(t(-1,11,7)) = t(A(-1,11,7)) = t(0,0,0) = (0,0,0)

So clearly Maple is wrong about the number of solutions.

For #2, the rank-nullity theorem tells you that:

rank(A) + nullity(A) = 4. See also Petrus' answer above, note that, by definition:

nullity(A) = dim(ker(A))

For #3: on these types of problems it's good to play with some simple examples.

Try using:

$A = \begin{bmatrix}1&0\\0&0 \end{bmatrix}$

$b = \begin{bmatrix}1\\0 \end{bmatrix}$

and

$c = \begin{bmatrix}2\\0 \end{bmatrix}$

or

$c = \begin{bmatrix}0\\2 \end{bmatrix}$

Now suppose the statement is false:

this means that we have a UNIQUE solution x0 of Ax = c, but infinitely many of Ax = b.

Pick two DIFFERENT solutions of Ax = b, say x = x1, x2.

Since these are different solutions, x1 - x2 ≠ 0, so x1 - x2 + x0 ≠ x0.

Now A(x1 - x2 + x0) = A(x1) - A(x2) + A(x0​) = b - b + c =...?
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
909