Systems with global phase invariance, 3D string?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of a three-dimensional string occupying a space represented by S^3 and its relationship with global phase invariance. Participants explore the implications of this model in the context of quantum mechanics, particularly regarding the dynamics of the string and its energy configurations. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and potential physical interpretations, including the possibility of radiation production.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a 3D string model occupying S^3, with movement occurring in a tangential space S^1, suggesting that the system exhibits global phase invariance.
  • Another participant argues that time must be included as an additional coordinate for a complete description of the system.
  • There is a contention regarding whether the physics is contained in a 3D or 4D surface, with one participant asserting it should be a 4D surface including R^1.
  • Further clarification is provided that the 3D string remains a 3D solid while moving in the combined space of S^3, S^1, and R^1, and may stretch or twist, affecting its potential energy.
  • A question is raised about whether the invariance under global rotation of coordinates leads to a conserved quantity, with a suggestion that this could relate to conservation of momentum in S^1.
  • A proposal is made about the potential for dipole-like radiation from the 3D string by manipulating two points on the string, leading to outward-going waves.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the dimensionality of the space containing the physics of the 3D string, with no consensus reached on this aspect. Additionally, the implications of global phase invariance and its relation to conserved quantities remain open for discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity regarding the role of time and the dimensionality of the space in which the physics operates. There are unresolved mathematical steps regarding the implications of the string's movement and energy configurations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring theoretical physics, particularly in the areas of quantum mechanics, string theory, and the dynamics of complex systems.

Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,231
Reaction score
419
From:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics#Mathematical_formulation

...
In the mathematically rigorous formulation of quantum mechanics, developed by Paul Dirac[7] and John von Neumann[8], the possible states of a quantum mechanical system are represented by unit vectors (called "state vectors") residing in a complex separable Hilbert space (variously called the "state space" or the "associated Hilbert space" of the system) well defined up to a complex number of norm 1 (the phase factor).
...

Let a three dimensional analog of a one dimensional string completely occupy the space S^3. Movement only occurs in some tangential space, let this space be S^1. This system has a type of global phase invariance, an equal global change of the coordinate in the space S^1. Any point P in S^3 labels a point of our "3D string". An additional coordinate gives the position of point P in our space S^1. If all points in S^3 have the same coordinate in S^1 then the system will be at rest and will be in a minimum energy configuration. The state of this system does not change with a global coordinate transformation.

Now give the 3D string some energy and then freeze time. The physics is contained in the 3 dimensional surface that occupies the space S^3 U S^1, the union of S^3 and S^1. Again a global phase change does not change the physics.

Thanks for any thoughts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
andy everett wrote:

> From:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics#Mathematical_formulation
>
>
> ...
> In the mathematically rigorous formulation of quantum mechanics,
> developed by Paul Dirac[7] and John von Neumann[8], the possible states
> of a quantum mechanical system are represented by unit vectors (called
> "state vectors") residing in a complex separable Hilbert space
> (variously called the "state space" or the "associated Hilbert space" of
> the system) well defined up to a complex number of norm 1 (the phase
> factor).
> ...
>
> Let a three dimensional analog of a one dimensional string completely
> occupy the space S^3. Movement only occurs in some tangential space, let
> this space be S^1. This system has a type of global phase invariance, an
> equal global change of the coordinate in the space S^1. Any point P in
> S^3 labels a point of our "3D string". An additional coordinate gives
> the position of point P in our space S^1.

We need another "coordinate", time.


> If all points in S^3 have the
> same coordinate in S^1

for all time

> then the system will be at rest and will be in a
> minimum energy configuration. The state of this system does not change
> with a global coordinate transformation

of the coordinate in S^1.

.
>
> Now give the 3D string some energy and then freeze time.

We imagine the 3D string will evolve with time. For each point on S^1 we must have a tangential space (R^1 works) to plot the velocity of our point P in our space S^1.


> The physics is
> contained in the 3 dimensional surface that occupies the space S^3 U
> S^1, the union of S^3 and S^1.

Not right.


The physics is contained in 4 dimensional surface in the space:

S^3 U S^1 U R^1 the union of the spaces S^3, S^1, and R^1.

> Again a global phase change

of the coordinate of S^1

> does not
> change the physics.
>
> Thanks for any thoughts.

I hope I got it right this time, thanks for any thoughts.
 
andy everett wrote:
> andy everett wrote:
>
...
>
> > The physics is contained in the 3 dimensional surface that occupies
> the space S3 U S1, the union of S3 and S1.
>
>
> Not right.
>
>
> The physics is contained in 4 dimensional surface in the space:
>
> S3 U S1 U R1 the union of the spaces S3, S1, and R1. ...

Still not right.


Our 3D string starts out as a 3D solid in S^3. Movement occurs in the space S^1. We add the space of the real number line, R^1, at each point on S^1 so we can "plot" the velocity of a point in S^1. The 3D string moves in the space S^3 U S^1 U R^1. Just as a 2 dimensional sheet of paper stays 2 dimensional as we move it about in 3 dimensions our 3D string also stays 3 dimensional as it moves in S^3 U S^1 U R^1. It may and will stretch. So the above quote should read:

"The physics is contained in the 3 dimensional surface that occupies the space S^3 U S^1 R^1, the union of S^3, S^1, and R^1."

The surface may get "twisted" as a function of space coordinates S^3, increasing potential energy of the 3D string. Each small volume of the 3D string may have some velocity in the space S^1 resulting in kinetic energy of the 3D string. So we have a simple dynamic system where physics does not change under a global rotation of a coordinate. I'm sure there are many other such realizations.

Thank you for any thoughts.
 
I wrote:

"... So we have a simple dynamic system where physics does not change under a global rotation of a coordinate. ..."

Because of this do we get some conserved quantity?

Thanks for any thoughts.
 
Spinnor said:
I wrote:

"... So we have a simple dynamic system where physics does not change under a global rotation of a coordinate. ..."

Because of this do we get some conserved quantity?

Thanks for any thoughts.

Would that be conservation of momentum in the space S^1?
 
Can we produce dipole like radiation with our 3D string? I think so.

Grab two points, P1 and P2, of our 3D string that are "near" each other. Move each point such that their coordinates in S^1 vary with time as:

P1 = d*sin(w*t)
P2 = -d*sin(w*t)

where d is much smaller than the radius r of S^1. For points of our 3D string an equal distance from P1 and P2 the forces will cancel and for those points the coordinate of S^1 will not change with time. But for all other points the forces will not cancel and we will have outward going waves.

Thanks for any thoughts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K