Tainter Damper Figure: Analyzing Forces

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing forces acting on a Tainter damper, focusing on calculations related to buoyancy, pressure, and geometry. Participants are examining the relationships between various forces and the geometry of the damper, including the center of pressure and the area calculations involved.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to calculate forces such as horizontal and vertical forces, as well as the center of pressure. There are questions about the volume displaced and the implications of the geometry on the calculations. Some participants are also clarifying the correct formulas to use for specific calculations.

Discussion Status

There are ongoing clarifications regarding the calculations and formulas used, particularly concerning the center of pressure and area calculations. Some participants are questioning assumptions made in the original calculations and suggesting reconsideration of certain aspects. The discussion is active, with multiple interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are addressing potential typos in calculations and the implications of geometry on force calculations. There is a focus on ensuring the correct application of formulas and the impact of different scenarios on the results.

Guillem_dlc
Messages
188
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
1. A "Tainter" damper has the shape of a partial cylinder as shown in the figure. The width of the damper is ##12\, \textrm{m}##. Note that the height of the water corresponds to the height of the pivot point of the gate. Calculate the horizontal force in ##\textrm{kN}##. Other data: ##\rho =1000\, \textrm{kg}/\textrm{m}##, ##I_{xx}=bh^3/12##

2. Calculate the vertical force in ##\textrm{kN}##

3. Calculate the total force in ##\textrm{kN}##

4. Calculate angle of total force in degrees

5. Calculate the momentum of the horizontal force in ##\textrm{kNm}##.
Relevant Equations
##F=pA, p=\rho h##
Figure:
DA0F163B-E87E-4995-BDF6-A767E207A674.jpeg


Attempt at a solution:
$$b=12\, \textrm{m},\quad H=8\, \textrm{m}$$
a) $$F_H=p_{CG}A=3767040\, \textrm{N}=\boxed{3767,04\, \textrm{kN}}$$
$$A=8\cdot 12=96\, \textrm{m}^2$$
$$p_{CG}=\rho_g h_{cg}=39240\, \textrm{Pa}$$
b) $$F_V=mg=\rho_g V$$
We calculate ##\theta \rightarrow 8=10\cdot \sin \theta \rightarrow \dfrac{8}{10}=\sin \theta \rightarrow \theta =53,13\, \textrm{º}##
$$x=10\cdot \cos (\theta)=6\, \textrm{m}$$
We calculate ##A\rightarrow A=\dfrac{\pi r^2\cdot 53,13}{360}=\dfrac{6\cdot 8}{2}=22,3647\, \textrm{m}^2##
$$F_V=\rho_gV=\rho_g bA=\boxed{2632,77\, \textrm{KN}}$$
c) First of all we find ##\alpha## (angle between forces).
$$\alpha =\arctan \dfrac{F_V}{F_H}=34,95\, \textrm{º}$$
$$F=\dfrac{F_H}{\cos \alpha}=\boxed{4595,88\, \textrm{kN}}$$
d) $$\boxed{\alpha =34,95\, \textrm{º}}$$
e) First and foremost, we must locate the centre of pressure (CP).
$$y_{CP}=-\dfrac{\rho_g I_{xx}}{F_H}=-1,333\, \textrm{m}$$
$$M_o=F_H\cdot h_{cp}=F_H\cdot (4+1,333)=\boxed{20089,62\, \textrm{kN}\cdot \textrm{m}}$$
Does this one look good to you?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think again about the volume displaced in part b.
 
haruspex said:
Think again about the volume displaced in part b.
Wouldn't this be it, or would it affect everything? I can see well how I've done it, can't I?
 
Okay, maybe like this?
9C164CE5-375A-4188-80EA-DB3FECBF1C1F.jpeg
 
Guillem_dlc said:
Figure:
View attachment 316081

e) First and foremost, we must locate the centre of pressure (CP).
$$y_{CP}=-\dfrac{\rho_g I_{xx}}{F_H}=-1,333\, \textrm{m}$$
Again... That is not the formula for ##y_{CP}##. What you are using is the formula for ##\bar y - y_{CP}##. They are not the same thing. It's obvious you understand that is not ##y_{cp}## from the remainder of your calculation, which is why it's confusing that you keep calling it that.

As for everything else, it seems to check out.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Guillem_dlc
Guillem_dlc said:
Okay, maybe like this?
View attachment 316091
No.
It's a bit tricky. Suppose, instead of the sector of a circle given, the damper were to continue further to the right. Would that change the force? Would it change your calculation?
The area you have shaded would be correct if there were also water to the right. In that scenario, can you see a way to split the damper into two parts such that the water on the left is responsible for the buoyancy force on the left part and the water on the right responsible for that on the right part?
 
haruspex said:
No.
It's a bit tricky. Suppose, instead of the sector of a circle given, the damper were to continue further to the right. Would that change the force? Would it change your calculation?
The area you have shaded would be correct if there were also water to the right. In that scenario, can you see a way to split the damper into two parts such that the water on the left is responsible for the buoyancy force on the left part and the water on the right responsible for that on the right part?
And what I have marked in the figure at the beginning of everything, neither?
 
Guillem_dlc said:
And what I have marked in the figure at the beginning of everything, neither?
What is highlighted in post #1 is correct, but I looked at your working and you do not seem to have subtracted the triangular portion. I see ##A=\pi r^2\frac{\theta}{2\pi}##.
 
haruspex said:
What is highlighted in post #1 is correct, but I looked at your working and you do not seem to have subtracted the triangular portion. I see ##A=\pi r^2\frac{\theta}{2\pi}##.
They did. it's a typo.

Guillem_dlc said:
We calculate ##A\rightarrow A=\dfrac{\pi r^2\cdot 53,13}{360}=\dfrac{6\cdot 8}{2}=22,3647\, \textrm{m}^2##
Should read:

Guillem_dlc said:
We calculate ##A\rightarrow A=\dfrac{\pi r^2\cdot 53,13}{360}-\dfrac{6\cdot 8}{2}=22,3647\, \textrm{m}^2##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Guillem_dlc and haruspex
  • #10
erobz said:
They did. it's a typo. Should read:
Aha!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Guillem_dlc and erobz
  • #11
The only potential issue I can see with this method of converting the problem (which, isn't an issue for the questions you had to answer), what would you do if you actually had to locate the center of pressure ##CP (x_{cp},y_{cp} )##? I have a feeling you would find it in a place where it doesn't seem like it should be w.r.t the actual scenario. The question: Is it just a simple transformation back to the actual scenario?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 175 ·
6
Replies
175
Views
27K