Tangent Planes: Proof of Tangential Surfaces at (1,2,3) with Differentiation

  • Thread starter Thread starter dexza666
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planes Tangent
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the surfaces defined by the equations z = √(2x² + 2y² - 1) and z = (1/3)√(x² + y² + 4) are tangential at the point (1, 2, 3). Participants emphasize the necessity of differentiating both equations and evaluating them at the specified point to confirm the tangency. The conversation highlights the importance of showing work in mathematical proofs and encourages users to evaluate the second surface at the coordinates (1, 2) to find the corresponding z-value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differentiation techniques in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with the concept of tangent planes
  • Ability to evaluate functions at specific points
  • Knowledge of surface equations in three-dimensional space
NEXT STEPS
  • Practice differentiating multivariable functions
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of tangent planes
  • Explore examples of proving tangency between surfaces
  • Study the implications of surface continuity and differentiability
USEFUL FOR

Students in calculus courses, educators teaching multivariable calculus, and anyone interested in the geometric properties of surfaces in three-dimensional space.

dexza666
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Two surfaces are said to be tangential at a point P if they have the same
tangent plane at P . Show that the surfaces z = √(2x²+2y²-1) and z = (1/3)√(x²+y²+4) are tangential at the point (1, 2, 3).

differentiate first then evaluate both at 1,2,3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, I find it hard to believe this is not schoolwork and I am going to move it to the homework section.

Secondly you should understand that you must show some work and not just expect someone to tell you how to do it.

In fact, it looks like you have been told how to do it: "differentiate first then evaluate both at 1,2,3". Have you done that?

I must say that I foresee a serious problem in "showing that the surfaces are tangential at (1, 2, 3)"! You might try first evaluating the second one at x= 1, y= 2. What do you get for z?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K