Tangential velocity of external satellite

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the tangential velocity of an external satellite, exploring the conditions under which certain assumptions about acceleration are made. The subject area includes concepts of circular motion and orbital mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the assumption that a1 equals a2, with some attempting to derive the tangential velocity under this condition. Others reflect on the nature of the problem, considering the differences between circular motion and orbital motion influenced by gravitational forces.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing references and engaging in clarifications. There is an exploration of different interpretations regarding the nature of the motion involved, though no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the applicability of circular motion principles to the problem, indicating a need to consider gravitational influences and orbital dynamics more thoroughly.

jhonconnor
Messages
7
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Two satellites move in circular orbits around the Earth. The radius of the orbit of the outer satellite is three times that of the inner satellite (measured from the center of the Earth). If the modulus of the inner tangential velocity is v then that of the outer satellite is:

So I guess a_1 = a_2 where
a = (v_t)^2/r
and I found that
v_2 = sqrt(3)v_1
but the correct answer is
v_2 = v_1/sqrt(3)

Could you explain me what I'm doing wrong?
Relevant Equations
a = (v_t)^2/r
v_t = w*r
1740686340382.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you assume a1 = a2?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bdrobin519
mjc123 said:
Why do you assume a1 = a2?
Because I tried to get tangential velocity of external satellite with that condition
 
kuruman said:
Ohhhhh, it means that is another kind of problem. I thought that the problem can be solved with circular motion, but I didn't consider the orbital motion and the influence of the gravitational force. Thanks a lot
 
Would this not be the same?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250227_214007_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20250227_214007_Chrome.jpg
    28.4 KB · Views: 63
bdrobin519 said:
Would this not be the same?
The same as what?
 
jhonconnor said:
Ohhhhh, it means that is another kind of problem. I thought that the problem can be solved with circular motion, but I didn't consider the orbital motion and the influence of the gravitational force. Thanks a lot
But it is circular motion. The satellites go around the center of the Earth at constant speed just like a mass at the end of a string. The difference is in the nature of the force that provides the centripetal acceleration. The kinematics are the same.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jhonconnor

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
799
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K