Tangents at the pole (polar)

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Amad27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polar Pole
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the tangents at the pole for the polar function \( r = 1 - 2\cos(t) \). Participants explore the concept of the pole in polar coordinates, the conditions under which the curve intersects the origin, and the implications for calculating derivatives in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about the definition of the pole in polar coordinates, suggesting it is the origin and questioning how to find angles corresponding to \( r = 0 \).
  • Others argue that finding an angle for which the length of a line is zero does not make sense, as it implies the absence of a line.
  • A participant suggests that there are two values of \( t \) where the curve intersects the origin, prompting the need to find the equations of the tangents at those points.
  • Concerns are raised about the denominator becoming zero in the derivative \( dy/dx \) when \( r = 0 \), leading to confusion about the validity of the tangent calculations.
  • Some participants clarify that the derivative \( dy/dx \) is used instead of \( dr/d\theta \) because the question pertains to tangents to the curve, which can be more easily described in Cartesian coordinates.
  • Geometric interpretations are discussed, with some participants asserting that an angle cannot be formed if \( r = 0 \), while others provide insights into the parametric nature of the derivatives being calculated.
  • A participant suggests that visual aids may help clarify the relationship between the polar equation and the tangents at the origin.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the interpretation of the pole and the implications for finding tangents. Multiple competing views remain regarding the geometric meaning of \( r = 0 \) and the appropriate method for calculating derivatives in this context.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved assumptions about the geometric interpretation of polar coordinates, the conditions under which derivatives can be calculated, and the implications of having a zero denominator in the derivative formula.

Amad27
Messages
409
Reaction score
1
In a polar function,

$r = 1 - 2\cos(t)$ what are the tangents at the pole, considering $t$ an angle?

I am not sure what the pole is BUT!

$x = \cos(t) - 2\cos^2(t)$

$y = \sin(t) - \sin(2t)$ $dx/dt = -\sin(t) + 4\cos(t)\sin(t)$

$dy/dt = \cos(t) - 2\cos(2t)$

$dy/dx = \frac{\cos(t) - 2\cos(2t)}{-\sin(t) + 4\cos(t)\sin(t)}$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Olok said:
In a polar function,

$r = 1 - 2\cos(t)$ what are the tangents at the pole, considering $t$ an angle?

I am not sure what the pole is
The pole in polar coordinates is the origin. So you need to find the values of $t$ for which $r=0$.
 
Opalg said:
The pole in polar coordinates is the origin. So you need to find the values of $t$ for which $r=0$.

That can't make sense. How can you find an angle for which the length of a line is equal to 0. That line doesn't exist. It is a single coordinate.
 
Olok said:
That can't make sense. How can you find an angle for which the length of a line is equal to 0. That line doesn't exist. It is a single coordinate.
Think about it more carefully and you will see how it makes sense. There are two values of the parameter $t$ at which the curve passes through the origin. Your job is to find the equations of the tangents at those points.
 
Opalg said:
Think about it more carefully and you will see how it makes sense. There are two values of the parameter $t$ at which the curve passes through the origin. Your job is to find the equations of the tangents at those points.

Wait, so the pole is $(r, \theta) = (0, 0)$

But then the denominator becomes 0 for $dy/dx$

Also, I have a major question.

QUESTION:
When you have a polar equation, $r = 1-2\cos(\theta)$

Why is the derivative $dy/dx$ and not $dr/d\theta$
 
Olok said:
Wait, so the pole is $(r, \theta) = (0, 0)$

But then the denominator becomes 0 for $dy/dx$
The equation of the curve is $r = 1 - 2\cos\theta.$

If $r=0$ then $1 - 2\cos\theta = 0$, which means that $\cos\theta = \frac12$, and therefore $\sin\theta= \pm\frac{\sqrt3}2.$

You have correctly calculated that $\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{\cos\theta - 2\cos(2\theta}{-\sin\theta + 4\cos\theta\sin\theta}$. All you now have to do is to insert the above values for $\cos\theta$ and $\sin\theta$ into that formula. That will give you the gradients of the curve when it passes through the origin (and the denominator does not become 0 at those points).

Olok said:
Also, I have a major question.

QUESTION:
When you have a polar equation, $r = 1-2\cos(\theta)$

Why is the derivative $dy/dx$ and not $dr/d\theta$
The question asks for the tangents to the curve. You probably find it easier to describe these using cartesian coordinates rather than polar coordinates.
 
Opalg said:
The equation of the curve is $r = 1 - 2\cos\theta.$

If $r=0$ then $1 - 2\cos\theta = 0$, which means that $\cos\theta = \frac12$, and therefore $\sin\theta= \pm\frac{\sqrt3}2.$

You have correctly calculated that $\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{\cos\theta - 2\cos(2\theta}{-\sin\theta + 4\cos\theta\sin\theta}$. All you now have to do is to insert the above values for $\cos\theta$ and $\sin\theta$ into that formula. That will give you the gradients of the curve when it passes through the origin (and the denominator does not become 0 at those points).The question asks for the tangents to the curve. You probably find it easier to describe these using cartesian coordinates rather than polar coordinates.

Geometrically, it still does not make sense. To create an angle, you need two rays. If $r= 0$ then there can't be an angle?

Since $\cos(\theta) = 1/2 \implies \pi/3$

$-\sin(\theta) + 2\sin(2\theta)$

At $\pi/3$ this gives $= -\sqrt{3}/2 + \sqrt{3}$

?
 
Olok said:
Geometrically, it still does not make sense. To create an angle, you need two rays. If $r= 0$ then there can't be an angle?

Since $\cos(\theta) = 1/2 \implies \pi/3$

$-\sin(\theta) + 2\sin(2\theta)$

At $\pi/3$ this gives $= -\sqrt{3}/2 + \sqrt{3}$

?
Perhaps a picture will help. The polar equation $r = 1-2\cos\theta$ gives the black curve. You need to find the tangents at the origin, which are the two green lines.

[graph]vmgasyxoyt[/graph]
 
Opalg said:
Perhaps a picture will help. The polar equation $r = 1-2\cos\theta$ gives the black curve. You need to find the tangents at the origin, which are the two green lines.

Hey there,

So there is an intuition.

You have

$y = f(\theta)$
$ x = g(\theta)$

$\implies \theta = g^{-1}(x)$
$y = f(g^{-1}(x))$

y' = f'(g^{-1}(x)}\cdot \frac{1}{g'(g^{-1}(x))}$$

So, really you are finding the derivative of a xy curve, which is just parametric. So in really the derivative at theta something, means you are finding the derivative of a xy function, not with respect to theta. Really. It is focused on $x$ isn't it?

Can you please read the last paragraph carefully, and respond to it, share thoughts. Possibly confirm. Please. I would really appreciate this favor.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K