Taylor expansion of the relativistic Doppler effect?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving a first-order Taylor expansion for the relativistic Doppler effect equation, specifically the function F(x) = √(1 + x) / √(1 - x), where x = vrel/c. Participants clarify that the expansion should be performed about x=0, confirming that it is indeed a Maclaurin series. The conversation emphasizes the use of binomial expansion for fractional exponents to achieve the desired result, ultimately linking the relativistic Doppler effect to classical sound wave expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor series and Maclaurin series
  • Familiarity with relativistic Doppler effect concepts
  • Knowledge of binomial expansion for fractional exponents
  • Basic calculus, including differentiation and series expansion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Taylor series and Maclaurin series in detail
  • Explore the relativistic Doppler effect and its applications in physics
  • Learn about binomial expansion techniques for fractional powers
  • Investigate the relationship between sound wave equations and relativistic effects
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or mathematics, particularly those studying wave phenomena, relativistic effects, or series expansions. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of the mathematical foundations of the relativistic Doppler effect.

Amara
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
[Note from mentor: this thread was originally posted in a non-homework forum, therefore it does not use the homework template.]

I have been given an equation for the relativistic doppler effect but I'm struggling to see this as a function and then give a first order Taylor expansion. Any help at all would be appreciated as I'm completely stuck.

fo/fs = √(1 + vrel/c) / √(1-vrel/c)

Where vrel is the relative speed of the source and the observer with respect to each other, c the speed of light, and vrel > 0 is here presumed to mean that the source and
the observer move towards each other. Consider the relativistic Doppler effect in the case of (vrel/c) ≪ 1, but (vrel/c) > 0. Write a first-order Taylor expansion for the relativistic Doppler effect, and show that the result is equivalent to either of the two expressions found for sound.

The expressions for sound are:

i) The source moves with speed vs towards stationary observer

fo/fs = 1 / (1-(vs/v))

ii) The observer moves with speed vo towards the stationary source

fo/fs = 1 + (vo/v)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Amara said:
I have been given an equation for the relativistic doppler effect but I'm struggling to see this as a function and then give a first order Taylor expansion. Any help at all would be appreciated as I'm completely stuck.

fo/fs = √(1 + vrel/c) / √(1-vrel/c)

Where vrel is the relative speed of the source and the observer with respect to each other, c the speed of light, and vrel > 0 is here presumed to mean that the source and
the observer move towards each other. Consider the relativistic Doppler effect in the case of (vrel/c) ≪ 1, but (vrel/c) > 0. Write a first-order Taylor expansion for the relativistic Doppler effect, and show that the result is equivalent to either of the two expressions found for sound.

The expressions for sound are:

i) The source moves with speed vs towards stationary observer

fo/fs = 1 / (1-(vs/v))

ii) The observer moves with speed vo towards the stationary source

fo/fs = 1 + (vo/v)

This should probably be in the Homework section, right? But just to put this into a more obvious form, let x = v_{rel}/c. Then you want to expand the function

F(x) = \frac{\sqrt{1+x}}{\sqrt{1-x}}

in powers of x. Do you know how to do that?
 
Sorry this is my first question. Because it's university work I thought it would go here.

I started by doing that but I got confused with not having what would be a in a normal Taylor expansion question.
 
Amara said:
Sorry this is my first question. Because it's university work I thought it would go here.

I started by doing that but I got confused with not having what would be a in a normal Taylor expansion question.

I'm not sure what you mean by a "normal Taylor expansion question". The F(x) that I gave is an ordinary function with an ordinary Taylor expansion.
 
Okay I think my Taylor expansion needs some work. But getting confirmation that it's in this form helps. Thanks
 
I still have a problem with this. In a Taylor expansion I have a value to expand about. I am not given a value for this. And the question does not ask for a Maclaurin series.
 
Amara said:
I still have a problem with this. In a Taylor expansion I have a value to expand about. I am not given a value for this. And the question does not ask for a Maclaurin series.

You're expanding F(x) = \frac{\sqrt{1+x}}{\sqrt{1-x}} about x=0. Do you know how to do that?
 
Is this a Maclaurin series?

I'm not sure because I don't know if I should use binomial expansion or differentiate withTaylor.
 
Well, they amount to the same thing. You can use the binomial expansion for a fractional exponent:

(1+x)^\alpha = 1 + \alpha x + \frac{\alpha (\alpha -1)}{1 \cdot 2} x^2 + \frac{\alpha (\alpha -1)(\alpha - 2)}{1 \cdot 2\cdot 3} x^3 + ...

If \alpha is fractional, then the series never terminates, but that doesn't matter.

But that's the same series you would get if you took derivatives:

Letting G(x) = (1+x)^\alpha,

G'(x) = \alpha (1+x)^{\alpha - 1}
G''(x) = \alpha (\alpha - 1) (1+x)^{\alpha - 2}
G'''(x) = \alpha(\alpha - 1)(\alpha - 2) (1+x)^{\alpha - 3}
...

So you can write: G(x) = G(0) + x G'(0) + \frac{x^2}{1 \cdot 2} G''(0) + \frac{x^3}{1 \cdot 2 \cdot 3} G'''(0) + ...

You get the same series.

For this problem, if you're going to use binomial expansions, you have to compute the case \alpha = +\frac{1}{2} for \sqrt{1+x} and compute the case \alpha = -\frac{1}{2} for \sqrt{1-x} (using -x) and then you have to multiply the two series, and group the terms by powers of x.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor and Amara
  • #10
Thank you, this is clear now and has helped a lot
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
936
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K