Taylor series of 1/ln(t+1) at t=0

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter laurabon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Taylor series expansion of the function \( \frac{1}{\ln(t+1)} \) at \( t=0 \). Participants explore various methods to derive the series, including polynomial long division and the Taylor expansion of \( \ln(t+1) \). The conversation includes attempts to identify errors in calculations and clarifications about the nature of the series.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion over their results when using polynomial long division to find the Taylor series of \( \frac{1}{\ln(t+1)} \), noting discrepancies in coefficients.
  • Others provide the Taylor series for \( \ln(1+t) \) and suggest using it to derive the series for \( \frac{1}{\ln(1+t)} \), but there are disagreements on the correctness of the derived coefficients.
  • A participant mentions using Wolfram Alpha for verification, which leads to further questions about the results obtained.
  • Some participants discuss the potential for sign errors in long division and the challenges of handling the long denominator.
  • There is a suggestion that the series for \( \frac{1}{\ln(1+t)} \) may not exist in the traditional Taylor series form at \( t=0 \) due to the function being undefined at that point.
  • Clarifications are sought regarding the terminology used, particularly the phrase "natural Taylor expansion."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct form of the Taylor series for \( \frac{1}{\ln(t+1)} \). Multiple competing views and methods are presented, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct coefficients and the existence of the series.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential errors in calculations and the need for careful handling of series expansions. The discussion highlights the complexity of deriving series from logarithmic functions and the implications of undefined behavior at certain points.

laurabon
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I have tried to use the natural Taylor expansion of ln(t+1)
and working with long division but I get the result 1/t+1/2+t/12−t^2/24+⋯
instead of 1/t+1/2-t/12+t^2/24+... that is the right result
I have tried to do this several time but still don't works. Is there a miscalculation in my long division?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
laurabon said:
I have tried to use the natural Taylor expansion of ln(t+1)
and working with long division but I get the result 1/t+1/2+t/12−t^2/24+⋯
instead of 1/t+1/2-t/12+t^2/24+... that is the right result
I have tried to do this several time but still don't works. Is there a miscalculation in my long division?
Hard to tell without seeing your calculation.

The Taylor series at a point ##t_0=0## is
$$
f(t)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \dfrac{(t-t_0)^n}{n!} \left.\dfrac{d^{n}}{dt^n}\right|_{t_0}f(t)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\dfrac{t^n}{n!}f^{(n)}(0)
$$
so we need primarily the derivatives of ##f(t)=\log(t+1).##
\begin{align*}
f^{(0)}(t)&=\log(t+1)&\quad f^{(0)}(0)=\log(1)=0\\
f^{(1)}(t)&=\dfrac{1}{t+1}&\quad f^{(1)}(0)=\dfrac{1}{0+1}=1\\
f^{(2)}(t)&=-\dfrac{1}{(t+1)^2}&\quad f^{(2)}(0)=-\dfrac{1}{(0+1)^2}=-1\\
f^{(3)}(t)&=\dfrac{2}{(t+1)^3}&\quad f^{(3)}(0)=\dfrac{2}{(0+1)^3}=2\\
&\ldots &\ldots
\end{align*}
Now go on as long as you like and gather what you have.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba and dextercioby
fresh_42 said:
Hard to tell without seeing your calculation.

The Taylor series at a point ##t_0=0## is
$$
f(t)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \dfrac{(t-t_0)^n}{n!} \left.\dfrac{d^{n}}{dt^n}\right|_{t_0}f(t)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\dfrac{t^n}{n!}f^{(n)}(0)
$$
so we need primarily the derivatives of ##f(t)=\log(t+1).##
\begin{align*}
f^{(0)}(t)&=\log(t+1)&\quad f^{(0)}(0)=\log(1)=0\\
f^{(1)}(t)&=\dfrac{1}{t+1}&\quad f^{(1)}(0)=\dfrac{1}{0+1}=1\\
f^{(2)}(t)&=-\dfrac{1}{(t+1)^2}&\quad f^{(2)}(0)=-\dfrac{1}{(0+1)^2}=-1\\
f^{(3)}(t)&=\dfrac{2}{(t+1)^3}&\quad f^{(3)}(0)=\dfrac{2}{(0+1)^3}=2\\
&\ldots &\ldots
\end{align*}
Now go on as long as you like and gather what you have.
I agree with you and mabe is the safest way . About my calculation : I have used also walphram alpha and it says that 1/(x-x^2/2+x^3/6) (I used only these terms for ln(1+t) = 1/t+1/2+t/12−t^2/24

instead 1/log(1+t)=1/t+1/2-t/12+t^2/24 why this happens?
 
laurabon said:
I have tried to use the natural Taylor expansion of ln(t+1)
and working with long division but I get the result 1/t+1/2+t/12−t^2/24+⋯
instead of 1/t+1/2-t/12+t^2/24+... that is the right result
I have tried to do this several time but still don't works. Is there a miscalculation in my long division?
So, what you did was:
$$\ln(1 + t) = t - \frac{t^2} 2 + \frac{t^3} 3 -\frac{t^4}{4} \dots$$$$\frac 1 {\ln(1+t)} = \frac 1 {t - \frac{t^2} 2 + \frac{t^3} 3 -\frac{t^4}{4} \dots} = \frac 1 t + \frac 1 2 + \frac t {12} - \frac {t^2}{24} \dots $$Using polynomial long division?
 
Last edited:
PeroK said:
So, what you did was:
$$\ln(1 + t) = 1 - t + t^2 - t^3 \dots$$$$\frac 1 {\ln(1+t)} = \frac 1 {1 - t + t^2 - t^3 \dots} = \frac 1 t + \frac 1 2 + \frac t {12} - \frac {t^2}{24} \dots $$Using polynomial long division?
yes. Is it wrong ? the coefficient for log are different because I have used the Talor series but the calculation is that
 
laurabon said:
I agree with you and mabe is the safest way . About my calculation : I have used also walphram alpha and it says that 1/(x-x^2/2+x^3/6) (I used only these terms for ln(1+t) = 1/t+1/2+t/12−t^2/24

instead 1/log(1+t)=1/t+1/2-t/12+t^2/24 why this happens?
Sorry, I didn't see the inversion. It wasn't part of your post and was hidden in the title.
Please use https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/ and show what you actually did.

You can easily make sign errors in a long division if you aren't careful enough. And to deal with the long denominator is a nightmare, too. You'd probably better solve
$$
1=\left(x-\dfrac{x^2}{2}+\dfrac{x^3}{3}-\dfrac{x^4}{4}\pm \ldots\right)\cdot (a_0+a_1x+a_2x^2+a_3x^4+\ldots)
$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and PeroK
fresh_42 said:
Sorry, I didn't see the inversion. It wasn't part of your post and was hidden in the title.
Please use https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/ and show what you actually did.

You can easily make sign errors in a long division if you aren't careful enough. And to deal with the long denominator is a nightmare, too. You'd probably better solve
$$
1=\left(x-\dfrac{x^2}{2}+\dfrac{x^3}{3}-\dfrac{x^4}{4}\pm \ldots\right)\cdot (a_0+a_1x+a_2x^2+a_3x^4+\ldots)
$$
Yes you are right , it was my error . I was considering the denominator of taylor expansionfor log(1+x) with factorial but... it doesn't hae factorials... about what you proposed in yyour post , doing multiplication shouldn't a_0 be 0? because on the right I have 1+0x+0x^2=a_0x
 
laurabon said:
Yes you are right , it was my error . I was considering the denominator of taylor expansionfor log(1+x) with factorial but... it doesn't hae factorials... about what you proposed in yyour post , doing multiplication shouldn't a_0 be 0? because on the right I have 1+0x+0x^2=a_0x
If I look at the result, I should have started with ##a_{-1}\dfrac{1}{x}+a_0+a_1x+\ldots ## Then ##a_0## turns out to be a half.
 
If you only need a few of the first terms, I'd do it like this:
\begin{align*}
\frac{1}{\log(1+t)} &= \frac{1}{t-t^2/2+t^3/3-t^4/4+\cdots} \\
&= \frac{1}{t}\left[\frac{1}{1-\underbrace{\left(\frac{t}{2}-\frac{t^2}{3}+\frac{t^3}{4}+\cdots\right) }_x}\right] \\
&= \frac{1}{t}(1+x+x^2+x^3+\cdots)
\end{align*} Inside the parentheses, the term linear in ##t## only gets a contribution from ##x##. The ##t^2## term has two contributions: the second term of ##x## and the first term of ##x^2##, so you'd have
$$\frac{1}{\log(1+t)} = \frac{1}{t}\left[1+\frac{1}{2} t + \left(-\frac 13 + \frac 14\right) t^2 + \cdots\right]$$ And so on.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42 and PeroK
  • #10
1/\log(1 + t) doesn't have a Taylor series about t = 0, because the function is not defined (and therefore not differentiable) there: \log(1 + 0) = \log 1 = 0. It does have a Laurent series about t = 0.
 
  • #11
laurabon said:
I have tried to use the natural Taylor expansion of ln(t+1)
What is "the natural Taylor expansion"? Is this is typo?

-Dan
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K