Taylor's Theorem in simple english

  • Thread starter Thread starter InterNational
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    English Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Taylor's Theorem provides a framework for approximating functions using Taylor series, with a focus on the remainder term that quantifies the error of this approximation. The remainder, denoted as Rn(x), is expressed as Rn(x) = (fn+1(z))/(n+1)! (x-c)^(n+1), where z is between x and c. The inequality |Rn(x)| ≤ |x-c|^(n+1)/(n+1)! max |fn+1(z)| offers a bound on the approximation error, which is crucial for understanding the accuracy of Taylor polynomials. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing that a function can have derivatives of all orders without being analytic, as illustrated by the example of f(x) = e^(-1/x^2) at x=0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor series and their computation
  • Familiarity with concepts of convergence in calculus
  • Knowledge of derivatives and their notation
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of real analyticity and its implications for Taylor series
  • Explore the Lagrange error bound for nonnegative functions
  • Investigate examples of functions that are differentiable but not analytic
  • Learn about alternating Taylor series and their error estimation techniques
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and analysis, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Taylor's Theorem and its applications in approximating functions.

InterNational
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I'm having trouble conceptualizing Taylor's Theorem. I understand how to compute a taylor series, as well as figure out whether it converges or not. I also realize that since it is an approximation that there is a remainder that is the difference between it and the original function. I understand all that. My main issue of concern is with the algebraic notation of the remainder. In my book, which is written very poorly, it gives the remainder in two dfferent forms:
"If a function f is differentiable through order n+1 in an interval I containing c, then, for each x in I, there exists z between x and c such that
f(x) = f(c) + f'(c)(x-c) + ... + Rn(x)

where

Rn(x) = (fn+1z)/(n+1)! (x-c)n+1."
Forgive me for not knowing the coding and such. So, the equation(s) might look a bit sloppy.
The book goes on to say:
"One useful consequence of this theorem is that |Rnx| \leq |x-c|n+1/(n+1)! max |fn+1z|"
This part does not make sense to me. Again, sorry for making the formulas appear sloppy. I do not quite understand what that last inequality means. And, in addition, I do not know what max |fn+1z| refers to. Thanks for any help, and for even reading this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By max |fn+1z| I guess they mean the maximum value of |fn+1z| for z in the interval I. The usefulness of the inequality is that it gives a bound on the error in using a Taylor polynomial to approximate the function f.

Quick example: Take f(x) = exp(x), which has Taylor series 1 + x + x2/2 + ..., and let I be the interval [-1, 1]. The 2nd Taylor polynomial is T2(x) = 1 + x + x2/2, and the remainder is bounded by |R2(x)| ≤ (|x|3 / 3!) max |f3(z)|. Now f3(z) = exp(z), which has maximum value e on the interval I. Thus, |R2(x)| ≤ e/6 |x|3 for all x in I.

Since |x| ≤ 1 on I, you get a uniform bound |R2(x)| ≤ e/6 = 0.453.
 
To add to that,

When its an alternating taylor series, the maximum possible error is the next term from your approximation (the first term you dropped.).

When its nonnegative, you use the lagrange error bound. Where you need to find the max value and stuff.
 
Be careful about one thing: if a function has derivatives of all orders, we can, of course, form its Taylor series. but even if that series converges for all x, it does not necessarily converge to that function!

A function is said to be (real) analytic at a point if it is differentiable of all orders at that point (so its Taylor series exists at that point) and there exists some neighborhood of the point in which that series converges to the function.

An example of a function that has derivatives of all orders but is NOT analytic at a point is
f(x)= e^{-\frac{1}{x^2}}
if x\ne 0, 0 if x= 0. It can be shown that all derivatives exist and are equal to 0 at x= 0 so its Taylor series at x= 0 is just 0, but clearly the function is not 0 except at x= 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K