MHB TBI's question at Yahoo Answers (Indefinite integral)

AI Thread Summary
The integral of the function (e^sqrt(x) + 1) with respect to x is derived using substitution and integration by parts. The integral is expressed as I = ∫(e^sqrt(x) + 1) dx, which simplifies to I = ∫e^sqrt(x) dx + x + C. By letting t = sqrt(x), the integral transforms into a more manageable form, leading to the result I = 2e^sqrt(x)(sqrt(x) - 1) + x + C. This solution provides a clear method for tackling the indefinite integral. The discussion emphasizes the importance of integration techniques in solving complex integrals.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello TBI,

Denote $I=\int(e^{\sqrt{x}}+1)\;dx$, then $I=\int e^{\sqrt{x}}\;dx+x+C$. If $t=\sqrt{x}$, then $dt=\dfrac{dx}{2\sqrt{x}}=\dfrac{dx}{2t}$ so: $$\int e^{\sqrt{x}}\;dx=2\int te^{t}\;dt$$ Using the integration by parts method:

$$\begin{aligned}\left \{ \begin{matrix}u=t\\dv=e^tdt\end{matrix}\right.& \Rightarrow \left \{ \begin{matrix}du=dt\\v=e^t\end{matrix}\right.\\& \Rightarrow \int te^{t}\;dt=te^t-\int e^t\;dt\\&=\sqrt{x}e^{\sqrt{x}}-e^{\sqrt{x}}\end{aligned}$$ As a consequence: $$\boxed{\;I=\displaystyle\int(e^{\sqrt{x}}+1)\;dx=2e^{\sqrt{x}}(\sqrt{x}-1)+x+C\;}$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top