Technical Writing Help: Wiring a Relay Socket

  • Thread starter Thread starter david90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Writing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around improving technical writing for a report on wiring a relay socket. Participants explore how to clearly describe procedures and instructions related to electrical assembly, focusing on clarity, order of operations, and potential pitfalls in communication.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests rephrasing the instruction to emphasize identifying the function of relay socket terminals before wiring.
  • Another proposes including schematics to visually depict the function of each socket.
  • A different viewpoint argues against using "before" in instructions, advocating for a sequential approach similar to a recipe.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of clarity in technical writing, noting that even clear instructions can be misinterpreted by readers.
  • One contributor mentions the necessity of addressing safety concerns upfront in technical documentation to prevent errors.
  • Another suggests breaking down wiring directions into single actions to enhance followability, recommending a specific format for clarity.
  • Concerns are raised about the assumption that readers will remember pin configurations, advocating for explicit lists of pin functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the best approach to technical writing, with no consensus on a single method. There is agreement on the importance of clarity and safety, but various strategies for achieving this are proposed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the challenges of ensuring comprehension in technical writing, noting that previous clarity does not guarantee future understanding. There are also references to specific contexts, such as assembly in production runs and the risks associated with electrical work.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for technical writers, engineers, and anyone involved in creating instructional materials for electrical assembly or similar technical fields.

david90
Messages
311
Reaction score
2
I'm writing a report and I'm having trouble coming with the right words to describe a procedure.

Is there a better way to say "Before wiring PB2 (pushbutton) to the relay, refer to the wiring label on the relay to find the relay socket terminals function." ?

What I want to say is learn where the screws on the relay socket go to (coil, contacts etc) before wiring to it.

http://www.o-digital.com/uploads/2226/2228-1/Relay_Socket_18F_3Z_C2_982.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Perhaps direct the reader to a set of schematics which will depict the function of each of the sockets?
 
May not be much help but I would say that, in a report or set of instructions, it is not good to say "BEFORE..."
I feel you should say what needs to be done in order !
Imagine a cake recipe... put 4 eggs in a bowl, add flour , add water, before you put the eggs in the bowl take them from their shells...that sort of thing.
 
sandy.bridge said:
Perhaps direct the reader to a set of schematics which will depict the function of each of the sockets?

The relay cube that can be inserted into the relay socket has a wiring label (kinda like a schematic) on it.
 
I would say something like

Look at the wiring label on the relay and identify the ... and ... terminals. (You might want to add something about HOW to identify them, e.g. the relevant color codes, symbols, or whatever). Then wire PB2 to these terminals.
 
Then I think it would be suffice to merely prompt the reader to analyze the physical device before attempting to wire it.
 
As someone who has done technical writing for electronic assembly and sub-assembly I have to say that no matter how clear it is made some idiot will find a way to mis-interpret it. Assembly sheets would be distributed at the beginning of a production run and if there was something that was unclear to an assembler they would question me on it and I would explain it to them with some handwritten notes added. Then at the end of the run these sheets would be turned in. I would ask if there are ANY other things that they don't understand and should be made more clear. The answer was no so I made the handwritten notes permanent. What do you suppose happened the next production run? The SAME assembler couldn't understand a different part of the procedure. Hmmmm, last run it was crystal clear and now suddenly you don't get it? After 5 or 6 production runs less than a couple of months apart? I wanted this employee gone so bad.
 
sandy.bridge said:
Then I think it would be suffice to merely prompt the reader to analyze the physical device before attempting to wire it.

That works (sometimes!) for assembling flat-pack furniture, but not for anything that might be life-threatening. Not unless you want to get sued for damages, anyway.
 
Technical writing is fraught with pitfalls. First, avoid writing in the passive voice. You will lose a lot of people that way.

My method was to write up a step-by-step procedure (in a list format), and then turn that into prose, with explanations for *why* things should be done in a certain order, including the repercussions for screwing it up. You can include a version of the list before or after the prose, but you really need to get descriptive above and beyond the list. All concerns about safety for the humans and equipment involved ought to be laid out up-front, so there is no room for gross errors. Good luck.

BTW, much of my technical writing was aimed at providing better documentation and system descriptions for the operators of Kraft chemical-recovery boilers in pulp mills. Those monsters generally operated at 600 psi to 900 psi and they could be pretty dangerous if feed-liquor fell out of acceptable solids-concentration parameters. I carried $1M in liability insurance just so I could write those manuals, though a disastrous boiler explosion would eat up the whole $1M in one shot.
 
  • #10
don't assume the reader will remember the pin-out long enough to wire it up.

if you wish , give him a list of functions of pins

but make your wiring directions one action per step -
eg "connect red wire AA to coil+ , which is terminal 2 ."
action first, location next
order of sentence above tells him he'll need a screwdriver in one hand and red wire AA in other, then directs his eye to where to put them.

little details like that make a procedure followable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K