Telephone communications (easy question)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Communications
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for a signal to travel between Europe and North America via cable and geosynchronous satellite. The signal travels 8000 km via cable in approximately 0.02666 seconds, while the satellite signal, accounting for a round-trip delay and the Earth's radius, takes about 0.2256 seconds. This results in a comparison indicating that satellite communication is approximately 8.4621 times slower than cable communication. The calculations utilize the formula time = distance/speed, with the speed of light being 3E8 m/s.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, specifically speed, distance, and time calculations.
  • Familiarity with the speed of light (3E8 m/s) and its application in telecommunications.
  • Knowledge of geosynchronous satellite orbits and their implications on signal transmission.
  • Ability to perform unit conversions between kilometers and meters.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of latency in satellite communications compared to terrestrial connections.
  • Explore the physics of signal propagation in different mediums, including fiber optics and radio waves.
  • Learn about the calculations involved in determining the optimal satellite orbit for communication.
  • Investigate advancements in satellite technology that aim to reduce latency and improve signal speed.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying telecommunications, physics enthusiasts, and professionals in the field of satellite communications who seek to understand the time delays associated with different transmission methods.

Physics321
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Telephone connection between Europe and North America can be carried by cable or by the use of a geosynchronous communication satellite. Estimate the time it takes for a signal to travel 8000 km via cable, assuming the speed is close to the speed of light. How does this compare to the time required for the same signal to travel via satellite, at a near geosynchronous altitude of 40200 km from the center of Earth? (Assume the satellite is directly above the sending and receiving location of the signal.)


Homework Equations



time = (distance/speed)
so far I have the first part of this question correct, which asks 'estimate the time it takes for a signal to travel 8000 km.


The Attempt at a Solution



I have done this (8000 km x 1000 m)/(3E8 m/s) = 0.02666 seconds.
I am however confused on how to do the next part. It asks "how does this 'compare' to the time it takes for the same signal to reach 40200 km to a satellite".

Of course i first converted the km to m which would be 4.02E7 m. Am i suppose to find the time like above and somehow come up with a ratio?
Then, I would do something like this (4.02E7 m)/(3E8 m/s) = 0.134 seconds.
This is where i am stuck

I tried taking time1/time2 and time2/time1, but neither of these ratios work for the comparison

Any help would be appreciated.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't forget the satellite link has a round-trip delay associated with it. The signal not only has to get from Earth to the satellite, it then also has to get from the satellite to Earth too.

Also according to the problem statement, the orbit is "40200 km from the center of Earth." It may be required that you subtract off the radius of the Earth to get the correct distance.
 
Oh that makes sense.

So in turn I understand that

2x(4.02E7 m) {for there and back} - (6.37E6 m) {for the radius of the earth} divided by the speed of light.

Hence [(2x(4.02E7 m))-(6.37E6 m)]/(3E8 m/s) = 0.2467 seconds.

Thus, I am still stuck on how to compare these two times

If I try the first method, I get 0.02666/0.2467 = 0.1080 {ratio}

Or if I try the second ratio, I would get (0.2467)/(0.02666) = 9.2535, which sort of makes sense.
This would mean that it takes 9.2535 times slower to go from Europe to North America using a satellite compared to using a cable? It sounds legitimate considering the distances.
 
That's the right idea, except subtract off the radius of the Earth before you multiply by 2.
 
Sure, that makes sense as well.

Thus:

[2(4.02E7 m-6.36E6 m)]/(3E8 m/s) = 0.2256 seconds

which makes the comparison as follows:

0.2256 seconds/0.02666 = 8.4621

which simply means,

It would take 8.4621 times longer to reach North America from Europe using the satellite method compared to using the cable method.

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K