Temperature coefficient of resistance

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the temperature coefficient of resistance (a) using the equation ln R = aT + c. The user initially attempted to find a by treating it as a gradient, leading to confusion about the intercept (c). After calculating the gradient and intercept, the user found a value of a = -0.0927, but later realized the mistake of not converting temperature to Kelvin before calculations. Once the temperature was converted, the results appeared more reasonable and correct, indicating the importance of proper unit conversion in such calculations.
Philip Wong
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


ok we did a temperature coefficient of resistance at class, we need to calculate the coefficient of resistance (a) ourselves.
known variable:
R = resistance
ln R = log of resistance
T = tempreature
a = coefficient of resistance
c = the intercept


Homework Equations


ln R = aT+c
i.e. R= k exp(aT), where k=exp(c) is a constant.


The Attempt at a Solution


at first I thought I could calculate a as if it is gradient, and therefore worked out the intercept (c). But since a is the coefficient of resistance it didn't make sense to me to do it this way. So I'm lost
Anyways this is my working:
gradient = delta ln R/ delta T
= (lnR_1-lnR_2/T_1-T_2) = -.912185/44
= -0.02682897
therefore intercept (c) = -.912185 - (-.02682897 * 44)
= 10.8925618

put it back to the equation
lnR = a*T+10.893
given T = 64, its correspond ln R = 4.957 (we measured these ourselves, assume correct)

so:
4.957 = a*64+10.893
-5.936=a*64
a=-5.936/64
a=-0.0927

put everything back to original equation:
ln R = -0.0927 T + 10.893

is this even correct??
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if my above working was correct, here is the second part of my question.
during the experiment we only measure the resistance every 2C drop (from 100C to 30C). I've plot a ln R vs T graph, how can a determine the a at temperature of 65C?
 
arha! I was right in general, but had made a small mistake! I forgot to convert temperature into kelvin before I calculated the coefficient. when I convert it, everything looks more reasonable and correct!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
487
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K