Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Tempertaure of a moving object vs. stationary one

  1. Aug 25, 2012 #1
    Hello.
    If temperature is defined by the average kinetic energy of molecules, does this mean that moving an object in space increase it's temperature? (Or, say, looking at it from another inertial frame of reference?).
    talking about non-relativistic speeds.

    Thanks a lot!
    Mike
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 25, 2012 #2
    temperature is the system's *internal* energy, which includes molecular translational, rotational and vibrational motion. it does NOT include the system's *net* kinetic energy, which would be say... a piece of rock moving really fast, as opposed to a piece of rock that's still - the internal motion of the silicon/oxygen/iron/magnesium/carbon that make up the rock, stays the same.

    if it were otherwise, things could have arbitrary temperatures, since you can always find a frame that's moving arbitrarily fast (within the speed of light) relative to another.
     
  4. Aug 25, 2012 #3

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    If you put 1J of energy into a piece of rock, you can either move it a bit or warm it up a bit. Same amount of energy but it's much more accessible (to reclaim) when it's non-random motion then when it's 'thermal'. The distinction is so relevant that we give the two forms of energy two different names.
     
  5. Aug 25, 2012 #4
    I'm a bit of a Novice but the part of Kinetic Energy V^2(KE=1/2MV^2) I have noticed that it is apart of many different equations which means it can be manipulated a lot by different forces which affect the velocity of the object or particle so I'm sure you can increase the velocity without increasing the temperature.
     
  6. Aug 25, 2012 #5

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Well, there's an awful lot of really cold stuff hurtling around in space at amazingly high speeds. Massive available energy in the form of KE if it hit us but not enough thermal energy to nudge a thermometer (travelling alongside it).
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook