Temporal component of the normal ordered momentum operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the temporal component of the normal-ordered momentum operator in quantum field theory, specifically for a real scalar field with the Lagrangian \(\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi - \frac{1}{2} m^2 \phi^2\). The operator form of the conserved four-momentum is given as \(P^\mu = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2 \pi)^3} p^\mu a_p^\dagger a_p\). The user successfully derived the spatial components but struggled with the temporal component, particularly the cancellation of terms in the expression for \(P^0\). A key insight was provided regarding the inclusion of time-dependent factors in the field expansion, which may resolve the issue of term cancellation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts, particularly the Lagrangian formalism.
  • Familiarity with the energy-momentum tensor and its components.
  • Knowledge of creation and annihilation operators and their commutation relations.
  • Experience with field expansions in both the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the energy-momentum tensor for scalar fields in quantum field theory.
  • Study the implications of time-dependent factors in field expansions, particularly in the Schrödinger picture.
  • Explore the differences between the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the normal ordering process and its effects on operator expressions in quantum field theory.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum field theory, particularly those working on momentum operators and energy-momentum tensors. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of operator formalism in quantum mechanics.

mjordan2nd
Messages
173
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Consider the real scalar field with the Lagrangian \mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi - \frac{1}{2} m^2 \phi^2. Show that after normal ordering the conserved four-momentum P^\mu = \int d^3x T^{0 \mu} takes the operator form

P^\mu = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2 \pi)^3} p^\mu a_p^\dagger a_p.

I have already showed that the three spatial components of the momentum operator satisfy the above. I'm left with showing that the temporal component of the normal-ordered momentum operator also satisfies the above.

Homework Equations



The classical temporal component, T^{00}, of the energy-mometum tensor is

T^{00}=\frac{1}{2} \dot{\phi}^2+\frac{1}{2} \left( \nabla \phi \right)^2 + \frac{1}{2}m^2 \phi^2.

To quantize this we use the following expansion for the fields

\phi(x) = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2 \pi)^3 \sqrt{2 E_p}} \left[ a_p e^{i \vec{p} \cdot \vec{x}} + a_p^\dagger e^{-i\vec{p} \cdot \vec{x}} \right].

Note that a_p and a_p^\dagger satisfy the typical commutation relations for creation and annihilation operators.

The Attempt at a Solution



After taking the appropriate derivatives, expansion, simplifications using delta functions, commutation relations, and imposing that everything lies on the mass-shell I have been able to show that

P^0 = \frac{1}{4} \int d^3p \left[ \left( a_p a_{-p} + a_p^\dagger a_{-p}^\dagger \right) \left( \frac{-2 \vec{p}^2}{E_p} \right) + \left( a_p a_p^\dagger + a_p^\dagger a_p \right) 2E_p \right],

where E_p = p^0. I've been over this calculation twice, and am fairly confident that it is correct thus far, though I may still be wrong on that fact. If I only had the last two terms then this would be exactly what I was looking for. However, I can't see how to make the first two terms disappear in this case. For the spatial part I also had four terms, but instead of the first two terms being multiplied by p^2 they were only multiplied by p, making the first two terms odd, and thus disappear when integrated over the reals. In this case my first two terms are even, and so I'm a bit lost as to how to make them go away.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unfortunately, it seems that your mistake was made in deriving the equation you've given, because the first two terms should cancel out.

I think your issue might be in neglecting that the exponents in the field expansion should contain time-dependence. For example, I would expect that your term a_pa_{-p} should be multiplying a factor e^{-2i\omega t} (if I got the sign in the exponent right).
 
I wanted to explicitly do this in the Schrödinger picture. A friend and I were working on this together, and he decided to do this in the Heisenberg picture while I did it in the Schrödinger picture. I don't see where the exponentials would come from in the Schrödinger picture. I can post the gory details if you think that would be helpful.
 

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K