Commutator of Boost Generator with Creation operator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the commutation relation between the boost generator and the creation operator in the context of quantum field theory. Specifically, it examines how a pure boost transformation affects the creation operator for momentum, and seeks to find the commutator between the boost generator and the creation operator.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss expanding the left side of the equation involving the creation operator and the boost generator, but express difficulty in meaningfully expanding the right side. There is uncertainty about the appropriateness of leaving expressions in terms of derivatives of the ladder operators.
  • Some participants suggest using local transformation properties of free-field operators and appropriate mode decomposition.
  • Questions arise regarding the nature of the boost generator and how it relates to the vacuum state under Lorentz transformations.
  • One participant proposes simplifying the problem by considering a boost in a specific direction and differentiating both sides of the equation with respect to the boost parameter.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various approaches and questioning assumptions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of specific transformations and the potential to consult external resources for further clarification. However, no consensus has been reached on the exact nature of the boost generator or the commutation relation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of assigning meanings to derivatives of the creation operator and the need for explicit expressions for the boost operators. There is also mention of constraints related to the original problem statement and the context of quantum field theory.

MisterX
Messages
758
Reaction score
71

Homework Statement


Given that U upon acting on the creation operator gives a creation operator for the transformed momentum $$U(\Lambda) a_p^\dagger U(\Lambda)^\dagger = a_{\boldsymbol{\Lambda} \mathbf{p}}^\dagger $$
and ##\Lambda ## is a pure boost, that is ## U(\Lambda) = e^{i \boldsymbol{\phi} \cdot \mathbf{K}}##, find
$$ \left[\mathbf{K}, \, a_p^\dagger\right] $$


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


The first idea we had was to expand the left side giving
$$ a_p^\dagger + i\left[\boldsymbol{\phi} \cdot \mathbf{K}, \, a_p^\dagger\right] + \dots = a_{\boldsymbol{\Lambda} \mathbf{p}}^\dagger$$

However we are not able to meaningfully expand the right hand side, so we have hit a dead end. We don't know how to assign meanings to derivatives of ## a_{\mathbf{p}}^\dagger##. Is this the wrong approach?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd say, you have to use the local transformation properties of the free-field operators and then use the appropriate mode decomposition in terms of creation and annihilation operators.
 
I guess supposedly it's okay to leave expressions in terms of derivatives of the ladder operators. So I have used something like this.
$$U\left( \Lambda\right) a^\dagger_{\vec{p}}\,SU\left( \Lambda\right)^\dagger = a^\dagger_{\vec{p}} +i \beta_i \left[K^i, a^\dagger_{\vec{p}}\right] + \dots = a^\dagger_{\vec{p}} + \frac{\partial a^\dagger_{\vec{p}}}{p^\mu}\delta p^\mu + \dots$$

However, now the question remains, what is ##\vec{K} ##? Someone had the idea to use the fact that the vacuum Lorentz transforms into itself, but I wasn't able to follow the reasoning all the way to obtaining an expression for ##\vec{K} ##.
 
MisterX said:
I guess supposedly it's okay to leave expressions in terms of derivatives of the ladder operators. So I have used something like this.
$$U\left( \Lambda\right) a^\dagger_{\vec{p}}\,SU\left( \Lambda\right)^\dagger = a^\dagger_{\vec{p}} +i \beta_i \left[K^i, a^\dagger_{\vec{p}}\right] + \dots = a^\dagger_{\vec{p}} + \frac{\partial a^\dagger_{\vec{p}}}{p^\mu}\delta p^\mu + \dots$$

However, now the question remains, what is ##\vec{K} ##? Someone had the idea to use the fact that the vacuum Lorentz transforms into itself, but I wasn't able to follow the reasoning all the way to obtaining an expression for ##\vec{K} ##.
Here's my $0.02 ...

First, it would help to know what textbook or lecture notes you're working from.

Second, start simple by considering only a boost in a particular direction, say the z direction. And recognize that ##\Lambda_z## is a function of ##\phi##. Then,
$$ U\Big(\Lambda_z(\phi)\Big) ~=~ e^{i \phi K_z} ~.$$Also, write your creation operator as a function, i.e., ##a^\dagger_p \equiv a^\dagger(p)##.

The 1st equation in your OP then becomes
$$e^{i \phi K_z} \, a^\dagger(p) \, e^{-i \phi K_z}
~=~ a^\dagger\Big( \Lambda_z(\phi) \, p \Big) $$Now, differentiate both sides by ##\phi##, and then set ##\phi=0##. Then you'll need (or must look up) an explicit expression for the boost ##\Lambda_z(\phi)## as a matrix operating on ##p##. I.e., when acting in ordinary Minkowski space.

If you reach the tearing-out-hair stage, you can always consult Eugene Stefanovich's notes on Relativistic Quantum Dynamics (findable on the arXiv or via Google Scholar). Somewhere in there, he derives an explicit expression for the boost operators in terms of a/c operators.
 

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K