Tennis Ball Launcher Predicted Distance Help

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics project involving a tennis ball launcher, where participants are tasked with calculating the predicted distance the launcher can achieve. The original poster shares their calculations and expresses confusion regarding the results, particularly concerning the potential energy of the bungee cord and the distance it can be stretched.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the correct interpretation of the bungee cord's stretch and its implications on calculations. Questions arise about the setup of the launcher, including the angle of the cords and the method of determining the spring constant (k). There is also mention of neglecting air resistance and considering the mass of the platform.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's calculations, asking clarifying questions and suggesting considerations regarding the setup and assumptions. There is no explicit consensus, but multiple lines of inquiry are being explored to understand the problem better.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints such as the requirement to neglect air resistance and the potential significance of the mass of the bungee cords and platform in the calculations. The original poster indicates uncertainty about the correct values to use in their equations.

imusion
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
For our physics class we have to make a tennis ball launcher and we are also responsible for doing calculations to predict the distance our launcher will be able to launch the tennis ball.

I have done the calculations here and can be seen in this PDF file:
http://imusion.net/backup/yahoo.pdf

The diagram of our launcher can be seen in here:
http://imusion.net/backup/yahoo.jpg ...

I have looked through it but I know it is wrong. For u = 0.5kx^2 which is the first equation, x is the distance we can stretch the bungee cord which is supposed to be 1.2m and not 1.2-0.955(0.955 being the "slack " length of the cord). The problem is if I use 1.2m for x and follow through with everything else I get a ridiculous number like 500m. Which I know is not right.

Just a short explanation of what else I did for the calcs. After I found the PE of our bungee cord I plugged it into E=0.5mv^2 to figure out the velocity of the ball. With E being the potential energy present in the bungee cord. After I found the velocity I used projectile motion equations to solve for time. Because of the polynomial I had to use the quadratic equation to find out the time the ball is in the air. Then afterwards I plugged it into the horizontal distance.

If anyone can look through what I did and see if you can find what I did wrong I would appreciate that. I have looked through it numerous times already but I still dont' know what I'm doing wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
imusion said:
I have looked through it but I know it is wrong. For u = 0.5kx^2 which is the first equation, x is the distance we can stretch the bungee cord which is supposed to be 1.2m and not 1.2-0.955(0.955 being the "slack " length of the cord). The problem is if I use 1.2m for x and follow through with everything else I get a ridiculous number like 500m. Which I know is not right.

I'm not sure what you mean here. Can you stretch the cord 1.2m or is that the final length of the cord?
Remember that with Hooke's Law, the force comes from the spring (cord) being displaced from the equilibrium position.

Also, are your cords in line with the direction of shooting? Or are they at an angle?
How many cords do you have? Where did you get the k value from? Did you measure it, or estimate, or from a book or similar?

Another thing to consider (but at your level you probably won't have to calculate) is the reality of air resistance and it's effect on the flight path and distance. (Worth at least a mention in your report).Your picture looks like you have a 'platform' for the ball to sit on... don't forget that this has mass too.
 
Last edited:
tyco05 said:
I'm not sure what you mean here. Can you stretch the cord 1.2m or is that the final length of the cord?
Remember that with Hooke's Law, the force comes from the spring (cord) being displaced from the equilibrium position.

Also, are your cords in line with the direction of shooting? Or are they at an angle?
How many cords do you have? Where did you get the k value from? Did you measure it, or estimate, or from a book or similar?

Another thing to consider (but at your level you probably won't have to calculate) is the reality of air resistance and it's effect on the flight path and distance. (Worth at least a mention in your report).


Your picture looks like you have a 'platform' for the ball to sit on... don't forget that this has mass too.

From the equilibrium position, I can stretch the cord 1.2m MORE to the ground. So in reality x should equal 1.2m in my calculations.

The cords are at a 45 degree angle to the horizontal. 2 bungee cords are one one side and 2 bungee cords are on the other. The k value was found by doing a force/distance graph by putting different masses on the 2 bungee cords. Then the k value is doubled to account for the other 2 bungee cords on the other side.

Yes correct, we are told to neglect air resistance etc.

The platform has turned out just to be a small yogurt cup, so I don't think it has much significant mass.
 
imusion said:
The cords are at a 45 degree angle to the horizontal.

OK, I figured this much, but what I was really asking was how wide is your apparatus? You may need to resolve your forces for this as well (see attachment for a diagram).

Is the mass of the bungee cords significant? This could also affect things.
 

Attachments

The cords are lined up to shoot forwards. Our launcher is probably 75cm wide. At most 1m wide. The bungee cords do not have much mass either.
 
No one can provide insight on this? I know it has been awhile but I still want to figure this out haha.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K