Tension, horizontal & vertical tension

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the tension in two ropes supporting a mass (Z) of 800 kg, where one rope is vertical and the other is horizontal. The vertical rope experiences a tension equal to the weight of the mass, calculated as 9,800 N (800 kg * 9.8 m/s²). The horizontal rope does not exert any tension if the mass is hanging straight down, as it is not taut in this configuration. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding equilibrium and vector forces in this scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic knowledge of vector forces and equilibrium
  • Familiarity with free body diagrams
  • Concept of tension in ropes and cables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in physics
  • Learn how to draw and analyze free body diagrams
  • Explore the concept of tension in multiple rope systems
  • Investigate the effects of adding angles to tension forces in static systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of tension and equilibrium in static systems.

Shortyyy
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A mass Z is suspended by a vertical rope attached to the roof, and a second rope attached horizontally to a wall.

what is the tension in each rope if Z is hanging straight down?

What are the rope tensions?

Suppose Z has a mass of 800kg. what is the tension in the pair of ropes?

These questions have me stumped!
ANy help appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd start by drawing a free body diagram, or posting the diagram if one is give.

Also what does this mean?

Shortyyy said:
what is the tension in each rope if he is hanging straight down?
 
Sorry, I stuffed it up. fixed.

I have drawn a basic diagram but just do not know the formulas etc

Thanks.
 
Shortyyy said:
Sorry, I stuffed it up. fixed.

I have drawn a basic diagram but just do not know the formulas etc

Thanks.

Post your diagram.

(Upload it to http://imageshack.us" and copy & paste one of the forum board URLs)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/6206/98546679.png

Sorry, its just a quick mockup in paint of what I have on paper.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
uhm what are those things in green?
 
Vectors? - Gravity, equilibrium, constructed vectors for the ropes?

Am i wayyyy off track?
 
Shortyyy said:
Vectors? - Gravity, equilibrium, constructed vectors for the ropes?

Am i wayyyy off track?

Well normally if it is hanging straight down, I don't see the point in the second horizontal rope. But given the problem, I can only tell you to draw in the forces acting and then use the fact that it is in equilibrium to get the tensions.
 
This is the bit I am having trouble with.
So the forces acting would be gravity pulling Z down, which needs an equal and opposite vector for equilibrium (upward). the vector of the diagonal of the parallelogram?

Its got me royally stumped.
 
  • #10
Shortyyy said:
This is the bit I am having trouble with.
So the forces acting would be gravity pulling Z down, which needs an equal and opposite vector for equilibrium (upward). the vector of the diagonal of the parallelogram?

Its got me royally stumped.

Well if you remove all the green for the moment, you just have the ropes and the mass.

Now acting on the mass (vertically), there is tension and weight (you know that acts downwards). So what direction should the tension act in this rope?

Similarly, horizontally, there is only tension acting.
 
  • #11
rock.freak667 said:
Well if you remove all the green for the moment, you just have the ropes and the mass.

Now acting on the mass (vertically), there is tension and weight (you know that acts downwards). So what direction should the tension act in this rope?

Similarly, horizontally, there is only tension acting.

Vertically the direction of the tension in the rope should be upward.
Horizontally the tension in the rope should be acting toward the wall?
 
  • #12
Shortyyy said:
Vertically the direction of the tension in the rope should be upward.
Horizontally the tension in the rope should be acting toward the wall?

Yes that is correct. So if vertically the mass does not move, what is the resultant force in the vertical direction? (Do the same horizontally)
 
  • #13
rock.freak667 said:
Yes that is correct. So if vertically the mass does not move, what is the resultant force in the vertical direction? (Do the same horizontally)

So the tension on the vertical rope is 9.8N? same for the horizontal?
 
  • #14
i'm confused with the horizontal one

i think there is only one force on horizontal direction which is tension towards the wall.
if so, then the system isn't in equilibrium
?
 
  • #15
Precisely why the horizontal force is zero =)
 
  • #16
oh, i see
hahahahahaha

but in fact i think it's possible to construct such system. I hang the mass and add a horizontal string which has a certain value of tension
 
  • #17
songoku said:
oh, i see
hahahahahaha

but in fact i think it's possible to construct such system. I hang the mass and add a horizontal string which has a certain value of tension
The horizontal string won't have any tension value unless you intentionally tighten it up and induce a value in it, in which case the mass and the upper rope will swing in toward the wall at a certain angle, but that's a different problem.
 
  • #18
Well yes, you can add the horizontal string, but if the mass is hanging vertically downwards, that must mean the horizontal string isn't taut.
 
  • #19
thanks for the explanation ^^
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K