HELP!!!
- 2
- 0
the trick is in the x and y components
The problem involves a 16 kg object in equilibrium suspended by a string with a specified length and linear mass density, interacting with two pulleys. The discussion focuses on determining the tension in the string and the frequency required for a standing wave pattern.
The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing hints and guidance on analyzing forces and components. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the angles involved and how they relate to the tension in the string.
Participants are grappling with the implications of equilibrium and the geometry of the problem, including the angles formed by the strings and the vertical components of the forces. There is mention of significant figures and the importance of accurate calculations in the context of the problem.
physicsbhelp said:yes but when i tried to use the length for the x-component it was wrong
Good! Now use what I told you in post #36.physicsbhelp said:48.187
In your problem, the F would represent the tension in the string. So write down the vertical component. (Just plug in the angle and compute the sin.)Doc Al said:vertical (y) component = F \sin\theta
Exactly! Now set that equal to what?physicsbhelp said:oooo now i get what you mean so its 2F(sin(theda))
so basically i got 2*(sin(48.187))F
which = 1.491F
As far as the forces go, you can view the mass as being pulled by two strings--one left and one right. (Of course, it's just two parts of the same string, but that doesn't matter.)physicsbhelp said:but what i don't get is how you have 2 STRINGS because i am jus ttlaking about diagram a) so i hope u are not trying to figure out the tension in both the pictures.
or are you saying that since the big traingle can be divided into two triangles, there are two strings?
Yes! Then solve for the tension, F.physicsbhelp said:so now the next step i set 1.491F=mg?
No!or 1.491F=.6667--cos(48.187)
_Mayday_ said:PhysicsB, though this may seem unrelated to this thread, what book are you working from? I know what course you are taking (The same one as myself) but what book are you working from?
Looks good! (Round off your final answer to some reasonable number of significant figures.)physicsbhelp said:okay so mg=156.96
so 1.491F=156.96
so F= 105.2963827Newtons?
You've got to be kidding!physicsbhelp said:i am not using a book. my physics teacher believes that we should not use books because it hinders your learning of physics. so he gives us random questions.
Doc Al said:You've got to be kidding!![]()