Tensions in Hanging Beam with Given Weights

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Moments
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
10 replies · 2K views
Karol
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


The weight of the beam is 2000N, the masses: m1=200kg, m2=300kg.
What are the tensions in the ropes.

Homework Equations


Moments: ##M=F\cdot L##

The Attempt at a Solution


Moments around A:
$$\mbox{and}\left\{\begin{array}{ll} 1.5\cdot T_B+1.2\cdot T_B+0.6\cdot T_A=1962\cdot 0.6+2000\cdot 0.8+2943\cdot 1.2 \\ 2T_A+2T_B=1962+2000+2943\rightarrow T_A=3452.5-T_B \end{array}\right.$$
$$2.7\cdot T_B+0.6(3452.5-T_B)=6308.8\rightarrow T_B=-986.4$$
The sign isn't correct and it should be TB=1013.3
 

Attachments

  • 19.jpg
    19.jpg
    43.7 KB · Views: 470
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with all your working except the final step. You should get about 2000. The given answer seems too low, even from a cursory consideration, since it should be greater than TA.
A couple of things look odd. W is off-centre, and W is given in N but the masses in kg, but juggling with those still does not give me around 1000.

Edit: If you are only wanting TB there is a slightly quicker way. If you pick the reference axis for torque carefully then TA doesn't feature.
 
Last edited:
haruspex said:
Karol has taken that into account.
Ah, yes.

I made a spreadsheet, and with the weight of the beam set to 200N (instead of 2000N), I found a first interval of 0.5m (instead of 0.6m) gave tension TA of 1012N and TB of 1541N. xxxxx (There may be errors.)

:smile:
 
In order to eliminate TA i combine the 2 TA forces into one which acts in the middle between them and then i take moments around that point:
$$1.2\cdot T_B+0.9\cdot T_B=2943\cdot 0.9+2000\cdot 0.5+1962\cdot 0.3=4237.3$$
$$2.1\cdot T_B=4237.3\rightarrow T_B=2017.8$$
 
Last edited:
Karol said:
In order to eliminate TA i combine the 2 TA forces into one which acts in the middle between them and then i take moments around that point:
$$1.2\cdot T_B+0.9\cdot T_B=2943\cdot 0.9+2000\cdot 0.5+1962\cdot 0.3=4237.3$$
$$2.1\cdot T_B=4237.3\rightarrow T_B=2017.8$$
Sure, but I'm saying that if TA is of no interest then you can take a shortcut to finding TB. If you pick your axis for torque carefully TA does not appear in the equation, so the one equation will do it. You don't need the vertical linear balance at all.
 
haruspex said:
Sure, but I'm saying that if TA is of no interest then you can take a shortcut to finding TB. If you pick your axis for torque carefully TA does not appear in the equation, so the one equation will do it. You don't need the vertical linear balance at all.
That's what i did but i got a totally different result for TB
 
haruspex said:
I agree with all your working except the final step.
$$2.7\cdot T_B+0.6(3452.5-T_B)=6308.8\rightarrow T_B=2017.8$$